PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
FGBFX vs. FXAIX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FGBFX and FXAIX is 0.01, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.0

Performance

FGBFX vs. FXAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Global Credit Fund (FGBFX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.08%
9.72%
FGBFX
FXAIX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FGBFX:

2.41

FXAIX:

1.97

Sortino Ratio

FGBFX:

3.64

FXAIX:

2.64

Omega Ratio

FGBFX:

1.44

FXAIX:

1.36

Calmar Ratio

FGBFX:

0.66

FXAIX:

2.98

Martin Ratio

FGBFX:

10.58

FXAIX:

12.34

Ulcer Index

FGBFX:

1.02%

FXAIX:

2.04%

Daily Std Dev

FGBFX:

4.46%

FXAIX:

12.79%

Max Drawdown

FGBFX:

-26.12%

FXAIX:

-33.79%

Current Drawdown

FGBFX:

-7.54%

FXAIX:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGBFX achieves a 1.77% return, which is significantly lower than FXAIX's 4.11% return. Over the past 10 years, FGBFX has underperformed FXAIX with an annualized return of 1.54%, while FXAIX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.09% annualized return.


FGBFX

YTD

1.77%

1M

1.64%

6M

3.08%

1Y

10.47%

5Y*

-0.52%

10Y*

1.54%

FXAIX

YTD

4.11%

1M

2.06%

6M

9.72%

1Y

23.78%

5Y*

14.37%

10Y*

13.09%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FGBFX vs. FXAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGBFX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FXAIX's 0.02% expense ratio.


FGBFX
Fidelity Global Credit Fund
Expense ratio chart for FGBFX: current value at 0.70% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.70%
Expense ratio chart for FXAIX: current value at 0.02% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.02%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

FGBFX vs. FXAIX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGBFX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FGBFX is 8080
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FGBFX is 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FGBFX is 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FGBFX is 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FGBFX is 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FGBFX is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

FXAIX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FXAIX is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FXAIX is 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FXAIX is 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FXAIX is 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FXAIX is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FXAIX is 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FGBFX vs. FXAIX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Credit Fund (FGBFX) and Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for FGBFX, currently valued at 2.41, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.002.411.97
The chart of Sortino ratio for FGBFX, currently valued at 3.64, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.003.642.64
The chart of Omega ratio for FGBFX, currently valued at 1.44, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.441.36
The chart of Calmar ratio for FGBFX, currently valued at 0.66, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.662.98
The chart of Martin ratio for FGBFX, currently valued at 10.58, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.0010.5812.34
FGBFX
FXAIX

The current FGBFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the FXAIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGBFX and FXAIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.502.002.503.003.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
2.41
1.97
FGBFX
FXAIX

Dividends

FGBFX vs. FXAIX - Dividend Comparison

FGBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than FXAIX's 1.20% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
FGBFX
Fidelity Global Credit Fund
3.61%3.68%3.69%5.83%2.03%2.98%2.34%2.67%1.98%2.37%3.14%2.29%
FXAIX
Fidelity 500 Index Fund
1.20%1.25%1.45%1.69%1.22%1.60%1.95%2.07%1.81%2.01%2.56%2.63%

Drawdowns

FGBFX vs. FXAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGBFX drawdown since its inception was -26.12%, smaller than the maximum FXAIX drawdown of -33.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGBFX and FXAIX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-7.54%
0
FGBFX
FXAIX

Volatility

FGBFX vs. FXAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Global Credit Fund (FGBFX) is 1.20%, while Fidelity 500 Index Fund (FXAIX) has a volatility of 3.21%. This indicates that FGBFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FXAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


1.00%2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
1.20%
3.21%
FGBFX
FXAIX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab