FGBCX vs. FSPGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class C (FGBCX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX).
FGBCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 27, 2002. FSPGX is managed by Fidelity.
Performance
FGBCX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGBCX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGBCX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class C | -0.53% | 6.08% | 0.04% | 5.09% | -14.63% | -1.98% | 8.73% | 8.49% | -1.43% | 2.68% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.03% | 18.54% | 33.27% | 42.77% | -29.17% | 27.57% | 38.46% | 36.38% | -1.79% | 27.70% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGBCX achieves a -0.53% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's -13.03% return.
FGBCX
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- -2.29%
- YTD
- -0.53%
- 6M
- 0.05%
- 1Y
- 2.91%
- 3Y*
- 2.51%
- 5Y*
- -0.76%
- 10Y*
- 1.17%
FSPGX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.03%
- 6M
- -12.06%
- 1Y
- 14.49%
- 3Y*
- 19.68%
- 5Y*
- 11.91%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGBCX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGBCX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGBCX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank
FGBCX
FSPGX
FGBCX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class C (FGBCX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGBCX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 0.66 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.12 | 1.10 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.15 | -0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 0.72 | +0.65 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.85 | 2.51 | +1.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGBCX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 0.66 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 | 0.56 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.78 | -0.42 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGBCX and FSPGX is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FGBCX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison
FGBCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, more than FSPGX's 0.40% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGBCX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class C | 2.60% | 2.82% | 2.44% | 2.27% | 1.10% | 0.47% | 3.73% | 1.69% | 1.76% | 0.99% | 1.54% | 1.64% |
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.40% | 0.34% | 0.37% | 0.73% | 0.86% | 2.22% | 1.76% | 1.04% | 1.32% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FGBCX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGBCX drawdown since its inception was -19.98%, smaller than the maximum FSPGX drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGBCX and FSPGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGBCX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.98% | -32.66% | +12.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.83% | -16.17% | +13.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.42% | -32.66% | +13.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.47% | -16.17% | +8.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.26% | -6.43% | +1.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.01% | 4.63% | -3.62% |
Volatility
FGBCX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class C (FGBCX) is 1.53%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 5.33%. This indicates that FGBCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGBCX | FSPGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.53% | 5.33% | -3.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.52% | 11.79% | -9.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.31% | 22.32% | -18.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.91% | 21.46% | -15.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.94% | 21.63% | -16.69% |