FGBCX vs. FCNTX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FGBCX (Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class C) and FCNTX (Fidelity Contrafund) are both mutual funds - FGBCX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity, while FCNTX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FGBCX returned 1.05%/yr vs 17.46%/yr for FCNTX. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. FGBCX charges 1.53%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for FCNTX.

Performance

FGBCX vs. FCNTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class C (FGBCX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGBCX achieves a -0.10% return, which is significantly lower than FCNTX's 8.01% return. Over the past 10 years, FGBCX has underperformed FCNTX with an annualized return of 1.05%, while FCNTX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.46% annualized return.

FGBCX

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: -0.04%
• YTD: -0.10%
• 6M: -0.24%
• 1Y: 4.01%
• 3Y*: 2.95%
• 5Y*: -0.91%
• 10Y*: 1.05%

FCNTX

• 1D: -0.08%
• 1M: 3.72%
• YTD: 8.01%
• 6M: 10.12%
• 1Y: 24.23%
• 3Y*: 27.03%
• 5Y*: 15.03%
• 10Y*: 17.46%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGBCX vs. FCNTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGBCX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class C	-0.10%	6.08%	0.04%	5.09%	-14.63%	-1.98%	8.73%	8.49%	-1.43%	2.68%
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	8.01%	21.76%	36.00%	38.67%	-28.31%	24.52%	32.48%	30.00%	-3.81%	32.18%

Correlation

The correlation between FGBCX and FCNTX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.11
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.03
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 1994	-0.10

The correlation between FGBCX and FCNTX shifts across timeframes, from -0.10 (all time) to 0.18 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FGBCX vs. FCNTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGBCX

FGBCX Risk / Return Rank: 13
FGBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
FGBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
FGBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
FGBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
FGBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

FCNTX

FCNTX Risk / Return Rank: 39
FCNTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FCNTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
FCNTX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FCNTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 34
FCNTX Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGBCX vs. FCNTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class C (FGBCX) and Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGBCX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	1.83	-0.86
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.47	2.54	-1.07
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	1.33	-0.15
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.29	2.26	-0.97
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.81	9.62	-5.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGBCX vs. FCNTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGBCX Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the FCNTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGBCX and FCNTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGBCX	FCNTX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97	1.83	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.15	0.79	-0.94
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.21	0.89	-0.68
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.78	-0.41

Drawdowns

FGBCX vs. FCNTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGBCX drawdown since its inception was -19.98%, smaller than the maximum FCNTX drawdown of -49.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGBCX and FCNTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGBCX	FCNTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.98%	-49.19%	+29.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.19%	-11.30%	+8.11%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.34%	-19.75%	+13.41%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.42%	-32.59%	+13.17%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-19.98%	-32.59%	+12.61%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.07%	-0.30%	-6.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.27%	-8.16%	+2.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.08%	2.65%	-1.57%

Volatility

FGBCX vs. FCNTX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class C (FGBCX) is 1.31%, while Fidelity Contrafund (FCNTX) has a volatility of 3.24%. This indicates that FGBCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FCNTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGBCX	FCNTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.31%	3.24%	-1.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.65%	10.48%	-7.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.84%	14.06%	-10.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.93%	19.15%	-13.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.95%	19.68%	-14.73%

FGBCX vs. FCNTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGBCX has a 1.53% expense ratio, which is higher than FCNTX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGBCX vs. FCNTX - Dividend Comparison

FGBCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.84%, less than FCNTX's 4.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCNTX Fidelity Contrafund	4.32%	5.21%	4.19%	3.78%	11.87%	10.80%	8.01%	4.16%	7.46%	6.08%	3.81%	5.33%
FGBCX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class C	2.84%	2.82%	2.44%	2.27%	1.10%	0.47%	3.73%	1.69%	1.76%	0.99%	1.54%	1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGBCX and FCNTX in my portfolio?

FGBCX and FCNTX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGBCX or FCNTX?

FCNTX has higher volatility (3.24%) compared to FGBCX (1.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGBCX dropped -19.98% vs FCNTX's -49.19%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCNTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.