FGBAX vs. FSPSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class A (FGBAX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX).
FGBAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 27, 2002. FSPSX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 1997.
Performance
FGBAX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGBAX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGBAX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class A | -0.27% | 6.90% | 0.67% | 5.86% | -14.15% | -1.38% | 9.59% | 9.33% | -0.54% | 3.46% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | 0.95% | 31.98% | 3.70% | 18.31% | -14.23% | 11.45% | 8.16% | 22.03% | -13.55% | 25.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGBAX achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly lower than FSPSX's 0.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FGBAX has underperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 1.92%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.97% annualized return.
FGBAX
- 1D
- 0.14%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 0.23%
- 1Y
- 3.49%
- 3Y*
- 3.26%
- 5Y*
- -0.16%
- 10Y*
- 1.92%
FSPSX
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -6.35%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- 1Y
- 22.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.61%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGBAX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGBAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGBAX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank
FGBAX
FSPSX
FGBAX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class A (FGBAX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGBAX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.88 | 1.39 | -0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.27 | 1.90 | -0.63 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.28 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 1.94 | -0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.26 | 7.43 | -3.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGBAX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 | 1.39 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.53 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.55 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.47 | +0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGBAX and FSPSX is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FGBAX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison
FGBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.30%, more than FSPSX's 3.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGBAX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class A | 3.30% | 3.58% | 3.07% | 2.97% | 1.73% | 1.09% | 4.51% | 2.44% | 2.54% | 1.87% | 2.37% | 2.36% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | 3.12% | 3.15% | 3.27% | 2.79% | 2.66% | 3.07% | 1.84% | 3.18% | 2.79% | 2.50% | 3.08% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
FGBAX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGBAX drawdown since its inception was -18.94%, smaller than the maximum FSPSX drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGBAX and FSPSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGBAX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.94% | -33.69% | +14.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.84% | -11.39% | +8.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.88% | -29.41% | +10.53% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.94% | -33.69% | +14.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.81% | -8.22% | +4.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.86% | -6.60% | +1.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 2.97% | -1.98% |
Volatility
FGBAX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class A (FGBAX) is 1.48%, while Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) has a volatility of 7.65%. This indicates that FGBAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGBAX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.48% | 7.65% | -6.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.55% | 11.01% | -8.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.34% | 17.00% | -12.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 15.82% | -9.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.98% | 16.49% | -11.51% |