Correlation
The correlation between FGBAX and FTHRX is -0.15. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
FGBAX vs. FTHRX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class A (FGBAX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX).
FGBAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 27, 2002. FTHRX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 23, 1975.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FGBAX or FTHRX.
Performance
FGBAX vs. FTHRX - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
FGBAX:
1.03
FTHRX:
1.85
FGBAX:
1.36
FTHRX:
2.66
FGBAX:
1.16
FTHRX:
1.33
FGBAX:
0.47
FTHRX:
1.19
FGBAX:
2.29
FTHRX:
5.45
FGBAX:
2.17%
FTHRX:
1.12%
FGBAX:
5.45%
FTHRX:
3.57%
FGBAX:
-18.39%
FTHRX:
-12.77%
FGBAX:
-6.33%
FTHRX:
-0.58%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGBAX achieves a 2.18% return, which is significantly lower than FTHRX's 2.67% return. Over the past 10 years, FGBAX has underperformed FTHRX with an annualized return of 1.74%, while FTHRX has yielded a comparatively higher 2.02% annualized return.
FGBAX
2.18%
-0.97%
0.72%
5.62%
1.48%
-0.59%
1.74%
FTHRX
2.67%
-0.58%
2.19%
6.63%
2.85%
0.81%
2.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGBAX vs. FTHRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGBAX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FTHRX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FGBAX vs. FTHRX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FGBAX
FTHRX
FGBAX vs. FTHRX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class A (FGBAX) and Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
FGBAX vs. FTHRX - Dividend Comparison
FGBAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, more than FTHRX's 3.51% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGBAX Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class A | 3.65% | 3.71% | 3.27% | 2.34% | 1.28% | 4.50% | 2.43% | 2.53% | 1.86% | 2.16% | 2.58% | 2.25% |
FTHRX Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund | 3.51% | 3.49% | 2.94% | 2.04% | 1.81% | 4.31% | 2.50% | 2.47% | 2.20% | 2.21% | 2.58% | 2.35% |
Drawdowns
FGBAX vs. FTHRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGBAX drawdown since its inception was -18.39%, which is greater than FTHRX's maximum drawdown of -12.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGBAX and FTHRX.
Loading data...
Volatility
FGBAX vs. FTHRX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Investment Grade Bond Fund Class A (FGBAX) has a higher volatility of 1.43% compared to Fidelity Intermediate Bond Fund (FTHRX) at 0.97%. This indicates that FGBAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTHRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...