PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGATX vs. FASEX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGATX vs. FASEX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Georgia Municipal Bond Fund (FGATX) and Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGATX achieves a 1.50% return, which is significantly lower than FASEX's 19.73% return. Over the past 10 years, FGATX has underperformed FASEX with an annualized return of 1.26%, while FASEX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.30% annualized return.


FGATX

1D
0.10%
1M
1.84%
YTD
1.50%
6M
1.87%
1Y
6.51%
3Y*
3.09%
5Y*
-0.18%
10Y*
1.26%

FASEX

1D
0.79%
1M
3.49%
YTD
19.73%
6M
18.08%
1Y
32.90%
3Y*
16.10%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*
11.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGATX vs. FASEX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGATX
Nuveen Georgia Municipal Bond Fund
1.50%2.82%1.44%6.08%-12.04%1.47%4.52%7.92%0.23%3.00%
FASEX
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund
19.73%9.68%10.40%14.20%-10.63%34.84%1.19%26.68%-13.00%19.23%

Correlation

The correlation between FGATX and FASEX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1987

-0.02

The correlation between FGATX and FASEX shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGATX vs. FASEX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGATX
FGATX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
FGATX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGATX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGATX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FGATX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGATX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FASEX
FASEX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FASEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASEX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FASEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGATX vs. FASEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Georgia Municipal Bond Fund (FGATX) and Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGATXFASEXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.19

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.41

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

4.55

-2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.17

16.56

-9.39

FGATX vs. FASEX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGATX Sharpe Ratio is 2.32, which is comparable to the FASEX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGATX and FASEX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGATX vs. FASEX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGATX drawdown since its inception was -19.12%, smaller than the maximum FASEX drawdown of -55.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGATX and FASEX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGATXFASEXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.12%

-55.57%

+36.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.85%

-7.37%

+4.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.08%

-22.26%

+16.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.91%

-22.26%

+5.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-16.91%

-44.56%

+27.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-0.06%

-1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.66%

-8.92%

+6.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

2.01%

-1.10%

Volatility

FGATX vs. FASEX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen Georgia Municipal Bond Fund (FGATX) is 0.84%, while Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX) has a volatility of 4.30%. This indicates that FGATX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGATXFASEXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

4.30%

-3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.16%

10.44%

-8.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.82%

13.95%

-11.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.19%

18.08%

-13.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.28%

20.22%

-15.94%

FGATX vs. FASEX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGATX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than FASEX's 1.16% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGATX vs. FASEX - Dividend Comparison

FGATX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.92%, less than FASEX's 12.25% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASEX
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund
12.25%14.67%5.29%3.12%6.32%4.02%1.06%0.89%4.48%7.93%3.67%3.49%
FGATX
Nuveen Georgia Municipal Bond Fund
2.92%3.15%2.97%2.74%2.49%2.00%2.31%2.64%2.87%3.22%3.51%3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGATX and FASEX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FASEX has higher volatility (4.30%) compared to FGATX (0.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGATX dropped -19.12% vs FASEX's -55.57%.

FASEX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 2.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGATX and FASEX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer