FGADX vs. EMO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FGADX (Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class) and EMO (ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund) are both mutual funds - FGADX is a Precious Metals fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while EMO is a MLPs fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, FGADX returned 16.24%/yr vs 6.84%/yr for EMO. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FGADX charges 0.62%/yr vs 13.90%/yr for EMO.

Performance

FGADX vs. EMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGADX achieves a 6.92% return, which is significantly lower than EMO's 15.80% return. Over the past 10 years, FGADX has outperformed EMO with an annualized return of 16.24%, while EMO has yielded a comparatively lower 6.84% annualized return.

FGADX

• 1D: 1.16%
• 1M: 2.22%
• YTD: 6.92%
• 6M: 19.14%
• 1Y: 85.86%
• 3Y*: 54.16%
• 5Y*: 22.03%
• 10Y*: 16.24%

EMO

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: -2.28%
• YTD: 15.80%
• 6M: 14.62%
• 1Y: 20.96%
• 3Y*: 32.17%
• 5Y*: 26.12%
• 10Y*: 6.84%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGADX vs. EMO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGADX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class	6.92%	197.29%	17.98%	2.20%	-23.24%	-3.76%	44.60%	51.87%	-17.89%	0.06%
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund	15.80%	7.38%	44.45%	31.76%	40.13%	74.70%	-64.47%	19.60%	-25.73%	0.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FGADX and EMO is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.18
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.30
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.23
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2011	0.24

The correlation between FGADX and EMO shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.30 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FGADX vs. EMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGADX

FGADX Risk / Return Rank: 43
FGADX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FGADX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
FGADX Omega Ratio Rank: 41
FGADX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
FGADX Martin Ratio Rank: 36

EMO

EMO Risk / Return Rank: 20
EMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
EMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
EMO Omega Ratio Rank: 21
EMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
EMO Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGADX vs. EMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX) and ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGADX	EMO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	1.27	+0.83
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.41	1.86	+0.55
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.24	+0.10
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.83	1.94	+0.90
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.96	4.29	+3.67
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGADX vs. EMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGADX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the EMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGADX and EMO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGADX	EMO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.10	1.27	+0.83
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.66	0.98	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.50	0.17	+0.33
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.11	+0.16

Drawdowns

FGADX vs. EMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGADX drawdown since its inception was -78.57%, smaller than the maximum EMO drawdown of -95.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGADX and EMO.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGADX	EMO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.57%	-95.06%	+16.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.15%	-10.87%	-20.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-31.15%	-18.81%	-12.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.77%	-28.59%	-20.18%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.27%	-93.02%	+43.75%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.57%	-6.64%	-13.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.71%	-31.96%	-2.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.06%	4.90%	+6.16%

Volatility

FGADX vs. EMO - Volatility Comparison

Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class (FGADX) has a higher volatility of 13.61% compared to ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund (EMO) at 6.24%. This indicates that FGADX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGADX	EMO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.61%	6.24%	+7.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	35.14%	12.32%	+22.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	42.21%	16.62%	+25.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	33.69%	26.74%	+6.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.77%	41.25%	-8.48%

FGADX vs. EMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGADX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than EMO's 13.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGADX vs. EMO - Dividend Comparison

FGADX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.18%, more than EMO's 8.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMO ClearBridge Energy Midstream Opportunity Fund	8.61%	9.41%	7.16%	6.79%	6.71%	6.71%	15.82%	10.94%	16.39%	10.85%	9.76%	11.88%
FGADX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund Advisor Class	9.18%	9.81%	12.51%	3.09%	0.00%	8.83%	10.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.62%	8.38%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGADX and EMO in my portfolio?

FGADX and EMO have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGADX or EMO?

FGADX has higher volatility (13.61%) compared to EMO (6.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGADX dropped -78.57% vs EMO's -95.06%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGADX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.