PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFXSX vs. SGINX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFXSX vs. SGINX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Limited Term Government Fund (FFXSX) and DWS GNMA Fund (SGINX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FFXSX having a 0.22% return and SGINX slightly lower at 0.21%. Over the past 10 years, FFXSX has outperformed SGINX with an annualized return of 1.26%, while SGINX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.05% annualized return.


FFXSX

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
0.22%
6M
0.50%
1Y
3.20%
3Y*
3.74%
5Y*
0.98%
10Y*
1.26%

SGINX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.05%
YTD
0.21%
6M
0.48%
1Y
5.88%
3Y*
3.86%
5Y*
-0.07%
10Y*
1.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFXSX vs. SGINX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFXSX
Fidelity Limited Term Government Fund
0.22%5.65%2.61%4.13%-6.37%-1.54%3.86%3.77%1.16%0.56%
SGINX
DWS GNMA Fund
0.21%7.88%0.59%4.93%-11.82%-1.12%3.29%6.65%0.42%1.52%

Correlation

The correlation between FFXSX and SGINX is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2001

0.70

The correlation between FFXSX and SGINX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (1 year) to 0.79 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFXSX vs. SGINX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFXSX
FFXSX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FFXSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFXSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFXSX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FFXSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFXSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

SGINX
SGINX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
SGINX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SGINX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
SGINX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
SGINX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
SGINX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFXSX vs. SGINX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Limited Term Government Fund (FFXSX) and DWS GNMA Fund (SGINX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFXSXSGINXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.31

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

2.01

+0.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.67

6.58

+1.09

FFXSX vs. SGINX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFXSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is comparable to the SGINX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFXSX and SGINX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFXSXSGINXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.65

1.68

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

-0.01

+0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.22

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.56

0.76

+0.80

Drawdowns

FFXSX vs. SGINX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFXSX drawdown since its inception was -9.78%, smaller than the maximum SGINX drawdown of -17.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFXSX and SGINX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFXSXSGINXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.78%

-17.37%

+7.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.43%

-3.23%

+1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.62%

-7.51%

+5.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.20%

-16.98%

+7.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.78%

-17.37%

+7.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.68%

-1.86%

+1.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-1.97%

+1.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.45%

0.98%

-0.53%

Volatility

FFXSX vs. SGINX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Limited Term Government Fund (FFXSX) is 0.67%, while DWS GNMA Fund (SGINX) has a volatility of 1.66%. This indicates that FFXSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SGINX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFXSXSGINXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.67%

1.66%

-0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.48%

2.84%

-1.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08%

3.85%

-1.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.04%

6.44%

-3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.44%

4.82%

-2.38%

FFXSX vs. SGINX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFXSX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SGINX's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFXSX vs. SGINX - Dividend Comparison

FFXSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, less than SGINX's 4.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFXSX
Fidelity Limited Term Government Fund
3.37%3.30%2.47%2.21%0.72%0.42%1.23%1.88%1.35%1.18%1.20%0.85%
SGINX
DWS GNMA Fund
4.47%3.77%3.97%3.82%1.86%1.37%2.22%2.94%2.71%3.07%2.95%3.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFXSX and SGINX have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SGINX has higher volatility (1.66%) compared to FFXSX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFXSX dropped -9.78% vs SGINX's -17.37%.

SGINX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFXSX and SGINX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer