SGINX vs. FSTGX
Compare and contrast key facts about DWS GNMA Fund (SGINX) and Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund (FSTGX).
SGINX is managed by DWS. It was launched on Jul 13, 2000. FSTGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 2, 1988.
Performance
SGINX vs. FSTGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
SGINX vs. FSTGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGINX DWS GNMA Fund | 0.68% | 7.88% | 0.59% | 4.93% | -11.82% | -1.12% | 3.29% | 6.65% | 0.42% | 1.52% |
FSTGX Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund | -0.22% | 6.00% | 2.24% | 3.88% | -8.76% | -2.28% | 5.46% | 4.84% | 1.20% | 0.98% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SGINX achieves a 0.68% return, which is significantly higher than FSTGX's -0.22% return. Over the past 10 years, SGINX has outperformed FSTGX with an annualized return of 1.14%, while FSTGX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.05% annualized return.
SGINX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- -1.33%
- YTD
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 5.58%
- 3Y*
- 3.72%
- 5Y*
- 0.06%
- 10Y*
- 1.14%
FSTGX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.10%
- YTD
- -0.22%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 3.29%
- 3Y*
- 3.16%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- 1.05%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
SGINX vs. FSTGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
SGINX has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than FSTGX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
SGINX vs. FSTGX — Risk / Return Rank
SGINX
FSTGX
SGINX vs. FSTGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for DWS GNMA Fund (SGINX) and Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund (FSTGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SGINX | FSTGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.31 | 1.08 | +0.23 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | 1.65 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.20 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 1.83 | +0.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.82 | 5.68 | +1.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SGINX | FSTGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.31 | 1.08 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 | 0.10 | -0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.24 | 0.31 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.77 | 1.21 | -0.44 |
Correlation
The correlation between SGINX and FSTGX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
SGINX vs. FSTGX - Dividend Comparison
SGINX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, more than FSTGX's 2.84% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SGINX DWS GNMA Fund | 4.64% | 3.77% | 3.97% | 3.82% | 1.86% | 1.37% | 2.22% | 2.94% | 2.71% | 3.07% | 2.95% | 3.41% |
FSTGX Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund | 2.84% | 3.04% | 2.94% | 2.12% | 0.99% | 0.77% | 2.65% | 1.85% | 1.84% | 1.47% | 1.52% | 1.69% |
Drawdowns
SGINX vs. FSTGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SGINX drawdown since its inception was -17.37%, which is greater than FSTGX's maximum drawdown of -13.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SGINX and FSTGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| SGINX | FSTGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.37% | -13.66% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.96% | -1.80% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.18% | -12.54% | -4.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.37% | -13.66% | -3.71% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.41% | -1.40% | -0.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.97% | -1.57% | -0.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.99% | 0.58% | +0.41% |
Volatility
SGINX vs. FSTGX - Volatility Comparison
DWS GNMA Fund (SGINX) has a higher volatility of 1.39% compared to Fidelity Intermediate Government Income Fund (FSTGX) at 0.96%. This indicates that SGINX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSTGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| SGINX | FSTGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.39% | 0.96% | +0.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.41% | 1.72% | +0.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.51% | 2.96% | +1.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.39% | 4.09% | +2.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.78% | 3.38% | +1.40% |