PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFVTX vs. FRQIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFVTX vs. FRQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2015 Fund Class M (FFVTX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFVTX achieves a 5.55% return, which is significantly higher than FRQIX's 3.60% return. Over the past 10 years, FFVTX has outperformed FRQIX with an annualized return of 6.03%, while FRQIX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.14% annualized return.


FFVTX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.27%
6M
5.55%
YTD
5.55%
1Y
10.87%
3Y*
9.31%
5Y*
3.53%
10Y*
6.03%

FRQIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.22%
6M
3.60%
YTD
3.60%
1Y
7.93%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
2.72%
10Y*
5.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFVTX vs. FRQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFVTX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2015 Fund Class M
5.55%12.33%5.62%10.42%-15.02%6.59%11.52%16.36%-4.60%12.32%
FRQIX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I
3.60%9.97%4.48%8.52%-12.39%3.82%9.58%12.63%-2.84%10.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FFVTX and FRQIX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 30, 2007

0.97

The correlation between FFVTX and FRQIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFVTX vs. FRQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFVTX
FFVTX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FFVTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFVTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFVTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
FFVTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFVTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQIX
FRQIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
FRQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFVTX vs. FRQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2015 Fund Class M (FFVTX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFVTXFRQIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.38

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.39

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.58

9.97

-0.40

FFVTX vs. FRQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFVTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is comparable to the FRQIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFVTX and FRQIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFVTX vs. FRQIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFVTX drawdown since its inception was -40.71%, which is greater than FRQIX's maximum drawdown of -38.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFVTX and FRQIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFVTXFRQIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.71%

-38.01%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.77%

-3.43%

-1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.80%

-5.21%

-1.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.84%

-17.04%

-3.80%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.84%

-17.04%

-3.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.18%

-0.42%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.56%

-4.42%

-0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

0.82%

+0.31%

Volatility

FFVTX vs. FRQIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2015 Fund Class M (FFVTX) has a higher volatility of 2.84% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) at 1.59%. This indicates that FFVTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFVTXFRQIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.84%

1.59%

+1.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.50%

3.66%

+1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.32%

4.32%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.65%

5.60%

+2.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.67%

5.28%

+2.39%

FFVTX vs. FRQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFVTX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQIX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFVTX vs. FRQIX - Dividend Comparison

FFVTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.42%, more than FRQIX's 3.22% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFVTX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2015 Fund Class M
6.42%6.57%3.77%2.11%7.83%10.05%6.74%6.60%10.19%5.66%4.37%5.18%
FRQIX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I
3.22%3.14%2.97%2.75%5.01%6.00%3.51%3.14%5.60%16.32%2.43%4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FFVTX and FRQIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFVTX has higher volatility (2.84%) compared to FRQIX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFVTX dropped -40.71% vs FRQIX's -38.01%.

FRQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFVTX and FRQIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer