FFUT vs. FBCG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FFUT (Fidelity Managed Futures ETF) and FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFUT is a Systematic Trend fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FBCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity. Both are actively managed. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FFUT charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FBCG.

Performance

FFUT vs. FBCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFUT achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly lower than FBCG's 15.59% return.

FFUT

• 1D: -0.90%
• 1M: 1.16%
• YTD: 12.74%
• 6M: 14.35%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FBCG

• 1D: -1.05%
• 1M: 7.84%
• YTD: 15.59%
• 6M: 15.51%
• 1Y: 39.38%
• 3Y*: 30.60%
• 5Y*: 15.84%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFUT vs. FBCG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	12.74%	8.26%
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	15.59%	20.53%

Correlation

The correlation between FFUT and FBCG is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025	0.05

FFUT vs. FBCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FFUT	FBCG
Technology	65.3%	48.3%
Financial Services	7.4%	2.2%
Communication Services	5.4%	16.6%
Consumer Cyclical	5.2%	17.2%
Industrials	4.5%	5.7%
Healthcare	4.2%	6.7%
Consumer Defensive	2.4%	1.3%
Energy	2.0%	0.4%
Utilities	1.7%	0.5%
Real Estate	0.9%	0.7%
Basic Materials	0.9%	0.6%

Return for Risk

FFUT vs. FBCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBCG

FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 57
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 57

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFUT vs. FBCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) and Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFUT	FBCG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.14	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.62	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.01	0.83	+1.17

Drawdowns

FFUT vs. FBCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFUT drawdown since its inception was -2.84%, smaller than the maximum FBCG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFUT and FBCG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFUT	FBCG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-2.84%	-43.56%	+40.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.17%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.89%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-43.56%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.90%	-1.05%	+0.15%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.88%	-11.49%	+10.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.90%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FFUT	FBCG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.79%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.89%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.17%	18.55%	-7.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.17%	25.79%	-14.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.17%	25.72%	-14.55%

FFUT vs. FBCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFUT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FBCG's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFUT vs. FBCG - Dividend Comparison

FFUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than FBCG's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.12%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%
FFUT Fidelity Managed Futures ETF	1.85%	2.09%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFUT and FBCG in my portfolio?

FFUT and FBCG have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FFUT or FBCG?

On fees, FBCG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFUT or FBCG?

FBCG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFUT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFUT or FBCG?

FFUT has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 0.04% for FBCG.

What is the main difference between FFUT and FBCG?

FFUT is categorized as Systematic Trend, while FBCG is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FFUT and 0.59% for FBCG.