PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFTY vs. SMST
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFTY vs. SMST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFTY achieves a 6.26% return, which is significantly higher than SMST's -35.77% return.


FFTY

1D
-0.91%
1M
-9.03%
6M
3.47%
YTD
6.26%
1Y
13.28%
3Y*
13.48%
5Y*
-2.78%
10Y*
5.57%
ALL TIME*
4.04%

SMST

1D
8.37%
1M
5.47%
6M
-29.35%
YTD
-35.77%
1Y
128.37%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-83.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$863.41K$1.19M$1.59M
$15.35M$15.12M$17.58M

FFTY vs. SMST - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FFTY
CapForce IBD 50 ETF
6.26%23.38%11.20%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
-35.77%-44.36%-91.71%

Correlation

The correlation between FFTY and SMST is -0.43, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.43

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 21, 2024

-0.45

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFTY vs. SMST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFTY
FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

SMST
SMST Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
SMST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMST Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMST Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
SMST Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMST Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFTY vs. SMST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFTYSMSTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.87

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.27

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.41

2.00

-1.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.00

3.68

-2.68

FFTY vs. SMST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFTY Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the SMST Sharpe Ratio of 1.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFTY and SMST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFTY vs. SMST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFTY drawdown since its inception was -59.46%, smaller than the maximum SMST drawdown of -99.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFTY and SMST.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFTYSMSTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.46%

-99.25%

+39.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.29%

-85.39%

+62.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-29.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-59.46%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-25.10%

-97.48%

+72.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.32%

-91.08%

+68.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.51%

46.35%

-36.84%

Volatility

FFTY vs. SMST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) is 8.45%, while Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF (SMST) has a volatility of 38.14%. This indicates that FFTY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFTYSMSTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.45%

38.14%

-29.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.16%

135.29%

-106.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.53%

151.04%

-114.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.75%

166.75%

-137.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.79%

166.75%

-138.96%

FFTY vs. SMST - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFTY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is lower than SMST's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFTY vs. SMST - Dividend Comparison

FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, while SMST has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFTY
CapForce IBD 50 ETF
1.27%1.35%0.91%0.65%2.75%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.17%
SMST
Defiance Daily Target 2X Short MSTR ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFTY and SMST have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SMST has higher volatility (38.14%) compared to FFTY (8.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFTY dropped -59.46% vs SMST's -99.25%.

On 1-year performance, SMST leads with 128.37% vs 13.28% for FFTY. On fees, FFTY is cheaper at 0.80% per year. On volatility, FFTY has been the lower-risk option at 8.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, SMST has performed better with a 128.37% return vs 13.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FFTY is cheaper with a 0.80% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for SMST.

FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for SMST.

FFTY is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while SMST is Inverse Equities. They also come from different issuers: CapForce and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FFTY and 1.29% for SMST.

SMST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.13 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFTY and SMST

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer