FFTY vs. QQQN

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FFTY (CapForce IBD 50 ETF) and QQQN (VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - FFTY tracks the IBD 50 Index while QQQN tracks the Nasdaq Q-50 Index. Both are passively managed. FFTY charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for QQQN.

Performance

FFTY vs. QQQN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FFTY

• 1D: -0.91%
• 1M: -9.03%
• 6M: 3.47%
• YTD: 6.26%
• 1Y: 13.28%
• 3Y*: 13.48%
• 5Y*: -2.78%
• 10Y*: 5.57%
• ALL TIME*: 4.04%

QQQN

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF	$863.41K	$1.19M	$1.59M
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FFTY vs. QQQN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF	8.00%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%

FFTY vs. QQQN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FFTY	QQQN
Healthcare	43.7%	19.9%
Financial Services	20.9%	-
Technology	18.5%	47.3%
Industrials	5.7%	8.7%
Basic Materials	3.6%	1.9%
Consumer Cyclical	3.6%	13.7%
Energy	2.6%	-
Utilities	2.1%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	1.0%	1.4%
Communication Services	0.9%	5.5%
Real Estate	0.5%	-

Return for Risk

FFTY vs. QQQN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFTY

FFTY Risk / Return Rank: 18
FFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
FFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
FFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 18
FFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
FFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 18

QQQN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFTY vs. QQQN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) and VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF (QQQN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFTY	QQQN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.26	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.59	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.07	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.41	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.00	—	—

Drawdowns

FFTY vs. QQQN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFTY drawdown since its inception was -59.46%, which is greater than QQQN's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFTY and QQQN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFTY	QQQN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.46%	0.00%	-59.46%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-23.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-59.46%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-59.46%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-25.10%	0.00%	-25.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.32%	0.00%	-22.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.51%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FFTY	QQQN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.45%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	29.16%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.53%	0.00%	+36.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.75%	0.00%	+29.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.79%	0.00%	+27.79%

FFTY vs. QQQN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFTY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQN's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFTY vs. QQQN - Dividend Comparison

FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, while QQQN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF	1.27%	1.35%	0.91%	0.65%	2.75%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.17%
QQQN VictoryShares Nasdaq Next 50 ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, FFTY or QQQN?

On fees, QQQN is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFTY or QQQN?

QQQN is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFTY or QQQN?

FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.00% for QQQN.

What is the main difference between FFTY and QQQN?

FFTY tracks IBD 50 Index, while QQQN tracks Nasdaq Q-50 Index. They also come from different issuers: CapForce and VictoryShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FFTY and 0.18% for QQQN.