FFTY vs. IVOG
FFTY (CapForce IBD 50 ETF) and IVOG (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds - FFTY tracks the IBD 50 Index while IVOG tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FFTY returned 5.57%/yr vs 10.91%/yr for IVOG. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FFTY charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for IVOG.
Performance
FFTY vs. IVOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFTY achieves a 6.26% return, which is significantly lower than IVOG's 15.87% return. Over the past 10 years, FFTY has underperformed IVOG with an annualized return of 5.57%, while IVOG has yielded a comparatively higher 10.91% annualized return.
FFTY
- 1D
- -0.91%
- 1M
- -9.03%
- 6M
- 3.47%
- YTD
- 6.26%
- 1Y
- 13.28%
- 3Y*
- 13.48%
- 5Y*
- -2.78%
- 10Y*
- 5.57%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.04%
IVOG
- 1D
- -0.07%
- 1M
- -2.89%
- 6M
- 11.25%
- YTD
- 15.87%
- 1Y
- 22.81%
- 3Y*
- 13.84%
- 5Y*
- 7.47%
- 10Y*
- 10.91%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $863.41K | $1.19M | $1.59M | |
| $2.19M | $2.83M | $3.26M |
FFTY vs. IVOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF | 6.26% | 23.38% | 18.36% | 12.40% | -51.08% | 11.92% | 18.20% | 25.74% | -16.76% | 37.62% |
IVOG Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF | 15.87% | 7.34% | 15.62% | 17.36% | -19.08% | 18.85% | 22.60% | 26.13% | -10.58% | 19.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFTY and IVOG is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.76 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.76 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 9, 2015 | 0.77 |
The correlation between FFTY and IVOG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFTY vs. IVOG — Risk / Return Rank
FFTY
IVOG
FFTY vs. IVOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FFTY | IVOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.21 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.41 | 2.20 | -1.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.00 | 7.98 | -6.98 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FFTY vs. IVOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFTY drawdown since its inception was -59.46%, which is greater than IVOG's maximum drawdown of -39.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFTY and IVOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFTY | IVOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.46% | -39.32% | -20.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.29% | -9.69% | -13.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.60% | -25.61% | -3.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.46% | -29.31% | -30.15% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.46% | -39.32% | -20.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -25.10% | -4.80% | -20.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.32% | -5.84% | -16.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.51% | 2.67% | +6.84% |
Volatility
FFTY vs. IVOG - Volatility Comparison
CapForce IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a higher volatility of 8.45% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF (IVOG) at 4.23%. This indicates that FFTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IVOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFTY | IVOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.45% | 4.23% | +4.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.16% | 14.00% | +15.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.53% | 17.93% | +18.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.75% | 20.70% | +9.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.79% | 20.61% | +7.18% |
FFTY vs. IVOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFTY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than IVOG's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFTY vs. IVOG - Dividend Comparison
FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, more than IVOG's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFTY CapForce IBD 50 ETF | 1.27% | 1.35% | 0.91% | 0.65% | 2.75% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IVOG Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth ETF | 0.56% | 0.64% | 0.79% | 1.15% | 1.05% | 0.47% | 0.74% | 1.17% | 1.01% | 0.93% | 1.11% | 1.04% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFTY and IVOG have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFTY has higher volatility (8.45%) compared to IVOG (4.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFTY dropped -59.46% vs IVOG's -39.32%.
On 10-year performance, IVOG leads with 10.91% vs 5.57% for FFTY. On fees, IVOG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IVOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.23%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IVOG has performed better with a 10.91% return vs 5.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IVOG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.
FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.27%, compared with 0.56% for IVOG.
FFTY tracks IBD 50 Index, while IVOG tracks S&P MidCap 400 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: CapForce and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FFTY and 0.10% for IVOG.
IVOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFTY and IVOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer