FFTY vs. IETC
FFTY (Innovator IBD 50 ETF) and IETC (iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFTY is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the IBD 50 Index, while IETC is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by iShares. FFTY is passively managed, while IETC is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FFTY returned -0.60%/yr vs 18.23%/yr for IETC. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFTY charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for IETC.
Performance
FFTY vs. IETC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFTY achieves a 20.11% return, which is significantly higher than IETC's 13.88% return.
FFTY
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 7.67%
- YTD
- 20.11%
- 6M
- 21.02%
- 1Y
- 38.14%
- 3Y*
- 21.57%
- 5Y*
- -0.60%
- 10Y*
- 7.57%
IETC
- 1D
- -2.13%
- 1M
- 11.52%
- YTD
- 13.88%
- 6M
- 12.87%
- 1Y
- 30.45%
- 3Y*
- 30.53%
- 5Y*
- 18.23%
- 10Y*
- —
FFTY vs. IETC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | 20.11% | 23.38% | 18.36% | 12.40% | -51.08% | 11.92% | 18.20% | 25.74% | -16.51% |
IETC iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF | 13.88% | 19.56% | 37.57% | 54.35% | -32.78% | 29.73% | 46.59% | 43.09% | -3.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFTY and IETC is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2018 | 0.76 |
The correlation between FFTY and IETC shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.76 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FFTY vs. IETC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FFTY
IETC
Industrials
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Financial Services
Healthcare
Energy
-
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Real Estate
-
Industrials
FFTY
IETC
Technology
FFTY
IETC
Basic Materials
FFTY
IETC
-
Financial Services
FFTY
IETC
Healthcare
FFTY
IETC
Energy
FFTY
IETC
-
Consumer Cyclical
FFTY
IETC
Communication Services
FFTY
IETC
Utilities
FFTY
IETC
-
Consumer Defensive
FFTY
-
IETC
-
Real Estate
FFTY
-
IETC
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFTY vs. IETC — Risk / Return Rank
FFTY
IETC
FFTY vs. IETC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) and iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFTY | IETC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.12 | 1.46 | -0.33 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.55 | 1.98 | -0.43 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.25 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.65 | 1.44 | +0.20 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.36 | 4.06 | +0.30 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFTY | IETC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 1.46 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 | 0.75 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.87 | -0.67 |
Drawdowns
FFTY vs. IETC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFTY drawdown since its inception was -59.46%, which is greater than IETC's maximum drawdown of -38.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFTY and IETC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFTY | IETC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.46% | -38.48% | -20.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -23.29% | -21.19% | -2.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.60% | -25.17% | -4.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -59.46% | -38.48% | -20.98% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.34% | -2.25% | -13.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.38% | -8.14% | -14.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.77% | 7.51% | +1.26% |
Volatility
FFTY vs. IETC - Volatility Comparison
Innovator IBD 50 ETF (FFTY) has a higher volatility of 9.42% compared to iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF (IETC) at 6.43%. This indicates that FFTY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IETC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFTY | IETC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.42% | 6.43% | +2.99% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.18% | 16.49% | +9.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.09% | 21.04% | +13.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.14% | 24.53% | +4.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.41% | 25.37% | +2.04% |
FFTY vs. IETC - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFTY has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than IETC's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFTY vs. IETC - Dividend Comparison
FFTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.12%, more than IETC's 0.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFTY Innovator IBD 50 ETF | 1.12% | 1.35% | 0.91% | 0.65% | 2.75% | 0.22% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.17% |
IETC iShares Evolved U.S. Technology ETF | 0.34% | 0.38% | 0.52% | 0.79% | 0.92% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 0.95% | 1.27% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFTY and IETC have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFTY has higher volatility (9.42%) compared to IETC (6.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFTY dropped -59.46% vs IETC's -38.48%.
On 5-year performance, IETC leads with 18.23% vs -0.60% for FFTY. On fees, IETC is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, IETC has been the lower-risk option at 6.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IETC has performed better with a 18.23% return vs -0.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IETC is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFTY.
FFTY has the higher dividend yield at 1.12%, compared with 0.34% for IETC.
FFTY is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while IETC is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FFTY and 0.18% for IETC.
IETC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.46 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFTY and IETC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer