FFTMX vs. FFANX
FFTMX (Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class M) and FFANX (Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds from BlackRock. Over the past 10 years, FFTMX returned 7.38%/yr vs 6.81%/yr for FFANX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FFTMX charges 1.16%/yr vs 0.52%/yr for FFANX.
Performance
FFTMX vs. FFANX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFTMX achieves a 8.81% return, which is significantly higher than FFANX's 7.59% return. Over the past 10 years, FFTMX has outperformed FFANX with an annualized return of 7.38%, while FFANX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.81% annualized return.
FFTMX
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- 6M
- 8.81%
- YTD
- 8.81%
- 1Y
- 16.72%
- 3Y*
- 12.06%
- 5Y*
- 5.58%
- 10Y*
- 7.38%
FFANX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 7.59%
- YTD
- 7.59%
- 1Y
- 14.69%
- 3Y*
- 11.05%
- 5Y*
- 5.27%
- 10Y*
- 6.81%
FFTMX vs. FFANX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFTMX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class M | 8.81% | 14.31% | 7.95% | 12.50% | -15.42% | 9.24% | 14.11% | 17.56% | -5.87% | 13.10% |
FFANX Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund | 7.59% | 13.16% | 7.40% | 11.52% | -13.62% | 8.03% | 13.10% | 15.81% | -4.06% | 11.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFTMX and FFANX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2007 | 0.99 |
The correlation between FFTMX and FFANX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFTMX vs. FFANX — Risk / Return Rank
FFTMX
FFANX
FFTMX vs. FFANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class M (FFTMX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FFTMX | FFANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.40 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.67 | 2.82 | -0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.36 | 11.99 | -0.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FFTMX vs. FFANX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFTMX drawdown since its inception was -38.42%, which is greater than FFANX's maximum drawdown of -31.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFTMX and FFANX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFTMX | FFANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.42% | -31.69% | -6.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.23% | -5.20% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.40% | -7.55% | -1.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.94% | -18.52% | -2.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.33% | -18.52% | -2.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.04% | 0.00% | -0.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.63% | -3.79% | -0.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.46% | 1.22% | +0.24% |
Volatility
FFTMX vs. FFANX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class M (FFTMX) has a higher volatility of 3.69% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) at 3.10%. This indicates that FFTMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFTMX | FFANX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.69% | 3.10% | +0.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.27% | 6.10% | +1.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.52% | 7.12% | +1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.43% | 7.96% | +1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.31% | 7.71% | +1.60% |
FFTMX vs. FFANX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFTMX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than FFANX's 0.52% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFTMX vs. FFANX - Dividend Comparison
FFTMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.47%, more than FFANX's 3.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFANX Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund | 3.65% | 3.97% | 2.81% | 2.49% | 5.75% | 2.35% | 2.36% | 3.67% | 4.56% | 2.56% | 1.43% | 3.18% |
FFTMX Fidelity Advisor Asset Manager 50% Fund Class M | 6.47% | 7.09% | 3.37% | 1.67% | 6.24% | 2.41% | 1.92% | 3.70% | 4.68% | 3.50% | 1.28% | 5.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, FFTMX and FFANX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FFTMX has higher volatility (3.69%) compared to FFANX (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFTMX dropped -38.42% vs FFANX's -31.69%.
FFANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFTMX and FFANX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer