PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFTHX vs. PLTZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFTHX vs. PLTZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund (FFTHX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFTHX achieves a 10.05% return, which is significantly higher than PLTZX's 9.09% return. Over the past 10 years, FFTHX has underperformed PLTZX with an annualized return of 10.54%, while PLTZX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.42% annualized return.


FFTHX

1D
0.21%
1M
0.80%
6M
7.45%
YTD
10.05%
1Y
19.63%
3Y*
15.79%
5Y*
7.65%
10Y*
10.54%

PLTZX

1D
0.24%
1M
0.98%
6M
6.04%
YTD
9.09%
1Y
17.73%
3Y*
17.25%
5Y*
8.79%
10Y*
11.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFTHX vs. PLTZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFTHX
Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund
10.05%19.16%11.03%17.67%-17.67%14.44%17.14%24.49%-8.40%20.73%
PLTZX
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund
9.09%17.76%16.89%20.36%-18.81%18.12%16.60%27.54%-9.24%22.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FFTHX and PLTZX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2013

0.97

The correlation between FFTHX and PLTZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFTHX vs. PLTZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFTHX
FFTHX Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
FFTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTZX
PLTZX Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
PLTZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTZX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFTHX vs. PLTZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund (FFTHX) and Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFTHXPLTZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.25

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.53

1.97

+0.55

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.75

8.55

+2.20

FFTHX vs. PLTZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFTHX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the PLTZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFTHX and PLTZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFTHX vs. PLTZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFTHX drawdown since its inception was -52.86%, which is greater than PLTZX's maximum drawdown of -34.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFTHX and PLTZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFTHXPLTZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.86%

-34.01%

-18.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.52%

-8.70%

+1.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.60%

-15.73%

+4.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.94%

-26.79%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.81%

-34.01%

+5.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.53%

-0.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.92%

-4.60%

-2.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.77%

2.01%

-0.24%

Volatility

FFTHX vs. PLTZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund (FFTHX) is 4.05%, while Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund (PLTZX) has a volatility of 4.44%. This indicates that FFTHX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFTHXPLTZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.05%

4.44%

-0.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.05%

10.50%

-1.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.54%

12.61%

-2.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.53%

15.59%

-3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.43%

15.93%

-2.50%

FFTHX vs. PLTZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFTHX has a 0.63% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTZX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFTHX vs. PLTZX - Dividend Comparison

FFTHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, less than PLTZX's 7.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFTHX
Fidelity Freedom 2035 Fund
5.85%5.03%2.75%1.86%11.21%11.62%5.93%6.75%7.66%3.17%4.00%5.97%
PLTZX
Principal LifeTime 2060 Fund
7.64%8.33%7.85%4.12%8.44%5.29%3.60%5.86%5.75%2.73%3.48%3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FFTHX and PLTZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

PLTZX has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to FFTHX (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFTHX dropped -52.86% vs PLTZX's -34.01%.

FFTHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFTHX and PLTZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer