PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFSZX vs. DRIJX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFSZX vs. DRIJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX) and Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFSZX achieves a 13.95% return, which is significantly higher than DRIJX's 11.69% return.


FFSZX

1D
0.58%
1M
5.16%
YTD
13.95%
6M
15.89%
1Y
31.60%
3Y*
21.06%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*

DRIJX

1D
0.32%
1M
4.70%
YTD
11.69%
6M
12.43%
1Y
27.40%
3Y*
20.18%
5Y*
11.69%
10Y*
12.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFSZX vs. DRIJX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FFSZX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6
13.95%24.08%14.41%20.78%-18.05%16.81%18.36%9.18%
DRIJX
Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
11.69%19.64%17.05%21.37%-15.25%21.63%14.09%8.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FFSZX and DRIJX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019

0.95

The correlation between FFSZX and DRIJX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFSZX vs. DRIJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFSZX
FFSZX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FFSZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

DRIJX
DRIJX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
DRIJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRIJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRIJX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
DRIJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRIJX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFSZX vs. DRIJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX) and Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFSZXDRIJXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.52

2.74

-0.22

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.46

3.87

-0.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.50

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.29

3.47

-0.18

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

14.70

15.69

-0.99

FFSZX vs. DRIJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFSZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the DRIJX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFSZX and DRIJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFSZXDRIJXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.74

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

0.81

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

0.81

-0.01

Drawdowns

FFSZX vs. DRIJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFSZX drawdown since its inception was -31.00%, smaller than the maximum DRIJX drawdown of -33.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFSZX and DRIJX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFSZXDRIJXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.00%

-33.55%

+2.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.77%

-8.12%

-1.65%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-15.25%

-0.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.17%

-23.49%

-3.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.81%

-4.19%

-1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.18%

1.78%

+0.40%

Volatility

FFSZX vs. DRIJX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRIJX) at 2.92%. This indicates that FFSZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRIJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFSZXDRIJXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

2.92%

+1.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.55%

8.23%

+2.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.76%

10.30%

+2.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.02%

14.56%

+0.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.05%

15.63%

+1.42%

FFSZX vs. DRIJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFSZX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than DRIJX's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFSZX vs. DRIJX - Dividend Comparison

FFSZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, more than DRIJX's 2.27% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DRIJX
Dimensional 2050 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
2.27%2.49%2.53%3.40%3.98%2.87%4.15%2.18%2.29%1.25%1.40%
FFSZX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6
5.03%3.82%2.92%2.26%8.99%7.98%2.41%1.47%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FFSZX and DRIJX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFSZX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to DRIJX (2.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFSZX dropped -31.00% vs DRIJX's -33.55%.

DRIJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.74 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFSZX and DRIJX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer