PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFSIX vs. FFANX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFSIX vs. FFANX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I (FFSIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFSIX achieves a 2.20% return, which is significantly lower than FFANX's 7.59% return. Over the past 10 years, FFSIX has outperformed FFANX with an annualized return of 14.38%, while FFANX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.90% annualized return.


FFSIX

1D
-0.35%
1M
3.63%
YTD
2.20%
6M
0.58%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
24.62%
5Y*
13.67%
10Y*
14.38%

FFANX

1D
0.80%
1M
1.55%
YTD
7.59%
6M
7.67%
1Y
17.09%
3Y*
10.99%
5Y*
5.51%
10Y*
6.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFSIX vs. FFANX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFSIX
Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I
2.20%15.23%39.62%14.33%-8.71%33.30%0.06%34.10%-15.84%20.23%
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
7.59%13.16%7.40%11.52%-13.62%8.03%13.10%15.81%-4.06%11.25%

Correlation

The correlation between FFSIX and FFANX is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2007

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between FFSIX and FFANX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFSIX vs. FFANX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFSIX
FFSIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FFSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

FFANX
FFANX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FFANX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFANX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFANX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FFANX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFANX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFSIX vs. FFANX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I (FFSIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFSIXFFANXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.47

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

3.27

-2.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.24

13.93

-10.70

FFSIX vs. FFANX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFSIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the FFANX Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFSIX and FFANX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFSIX vs. FFANX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFSIX drawdown since its inception was -75.57%, which is greater than FFANX's maximum drawdown of -31.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFSIX and FFANX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFSIXFFANXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-75.57%

-31.69%

-43.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.99%

-5.20%

-7.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.38%

-7.55%

-11.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.92%

-18.52%

-6.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.98%

-18.52%

-27.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.16%

0.00%

-1.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.15%

-3.79%

-13.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.55%

1.22%

+3.33%

Volatility

FFSIX vs. FFANX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I (FFSIX) has a higher volatility of 4.52% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund (FFANX) at 3.02%. This indicates that FFSIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFANX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFSIXFFANXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.52%

3.02%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.19%

6.03%

+6.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.05%

7.07%

+8.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.09%

7.94%

+13.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.88%

7.74%

+16.14%

FFSIX vs. FFANX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFSIX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is higher than FFANX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFSIX vs. FFANX - Dividend Comparison

FFSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.79%, more than FFANX's 3.65% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFANX
Fidelity Asset Manager 40% Fund
3.65%3.97%2.81%2.49%5.75%2.35%2.36%3.67%4.56%2.56%1.43%3.18%
FFSIX
Fidelity Advisor Financial Services Fund Class I
6.79%6.94%9.90%2.45%6.01%4.31%2.61%1.43%4.23%0.06%0.32%0.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFSIX and FFANX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFSIX has higher volatility (4.52%) compared to FFANX (3.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFSIX dropped -75.57% vs FFANX's -31.69%.

FFANX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.40 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFSIX and FFANX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer