PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFSDX vs. DRILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFSDX vs. DRILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K (FFSDX) and Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFSDX achieves a 13.87% return, which is significantly higher than DRILX's 12.39% return.


FFSDX

1D
0.58%
1M
5.12%
YTD
13.87%
6M
15.71%
1Y
31.37%
3Y*
20.81%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*

DRILX

1D
0.35%
1M
5.03%
YTD
12.39%
6M
13.17%
1Y
28.14%
3Y*
20.47%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
12.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFSDX vs. DRILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FFSDX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K
13.87%23.80%14.16%20.69%-18.22%16.59%18.26%9.09%
DRILX
Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
12.39%19.66%17.10%21.37%-15.28%21.08%14.10%8.77%

Correlation

The correlation between FFSDX and DRILX is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2019

0.95

The correlation between FFSDX and DRILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFSDX vs. DRILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFSDX
FFSDX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FFSDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFSDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFSDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFSDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFSDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

DRILX
DRILX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DRILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRILX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DRILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRILX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFSDX vs. DRILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K (FFSDX) and Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFSDXDRILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.52

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.24

3.70

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.47

16.18

-1.72

FFSDX vs. DRILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFSDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the DRILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFSDX and DRILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFSDXDRILXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

2.87

-0.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

0.81

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.82

-0.02

Drawdowns

FFSDX vs. DRILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFSDX drawdown since its inception was -31.03%, smaller than the maximum DRILX drawdown of -33.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFSDX and DRILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFSDXDRILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.03%

-33.48%

+2.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.80%

-8.58%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.40%

-15.76%

+0.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.29%

-23.50%

-3.79%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.87%

-4.24%

-1.63%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.19%

1.88%

+0.31%

Volatility

FFSDX vs. DRILX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K (FFSDX) has a higher volatility of 4.27% compared to Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX) at 3.12%. This indicates that FFSDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFSDXDRILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.27%

3.12%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.56%

8.72%

+1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

11.07%

+1.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.05%

14.84%

+0.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.03%

15.75%

+1.28%

FFSDX vs. DRILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFSDX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DRILX's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFSDX vs. DRILX - Dividend Comparison

FFSDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, more than DRILX's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DRILX
Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
1.34%1.47%2.40%3.26%3.97%2.25%2.11%2.12%2.25%0.91%1.96%
FFSDX
Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K
4.91%3.68%2.75%2.15%8.83%7.86%2.31%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFSDX and DRILX have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFSDX has higher volatility (4.27%) compared to DRILX (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFSDX dropped -31.03% vs DRILX's -33.48%.

DRILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFSDX and DRILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer