FFRCX vs. FSPSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class C (FFRCX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX).
FFRCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 16, 2000. FSPSX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 1997.
Performance
FFRCX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFRCX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFRCX Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class C | -0.78% | 4.38% | 6.18% | 10.70% | -2.34% | 4.08% | 0.61% | 7.49% | -0.95% | 2.85% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | -1.94% | 31.98% | 3.70% | 18.31% | -14.23% | 11.45% | 8.16% | 22.03% | -13.55% | 25.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFRCX achieves a -0.78% return, which is significantly higher than FSPSX's -1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FFRCX has underperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 3.88%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively higher 8.65% annualized return.
FFRCX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- -0.78%
- 6M
- 0.22%
- 1Y
- 3.55%
- 3Y*
- 5.79%
- 5Y*
- 4.05%
- 10Y*
- 3.88%
FSPSX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -10.86%
- YTD
- -1.94%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 19.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFRCX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFRCX has a 1.73% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFRCX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank
FFRCX
FSPSX
FFRCX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class C (FFRCX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFRCX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | 1.11 | +0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.67 | 1.56 | +0.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.23 | +0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.33 | 1.54 | -0.21 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.17 | 5.93 | +0.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFRCX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | 1.11 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.52 | 0.51 | +1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.97 | 0.53 | +0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.97 | 0.46 | +0.51 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFRCX and FSPSX is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
FFRCX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison
FFRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.79%, more than FSPSX's 3.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFRCX Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class C | 5.79% | 6.37% | 6.09% | 6.56% | 2.98% | 1.86% | 2.83% | 4.11% | 3.64% | 3.02% | 3.35% | 2.70% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | 3.22% | 3.15% | 3.27% | 2.79% | 2.66% | 3.07% | 1.84% | 3.18% | 2.79% | 2.50% | 3.08% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
FFRCX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFRCX drawdown since its inception was -22.31%, smaller than the maximum FSPSX drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFRCX and FSPSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFRCX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.31% | -33.69% | +11.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.73% | -11.39% | +8.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -6.30% | -29.41% | +23.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -22.31% | -33.69% | +11.38% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.00% | -10.86% | +9.86% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.13% | -6.59% | +5.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.61% | 2.96% | -2.35% |
Volatility
FFRCX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class C (FFRCX) is 0.72%, while Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that FFRCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFRCX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.72% | 7.04% | -6.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.51% | 10.63% | -9.12% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18% | 16.79% | -13.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.67% | 15.77% | -13.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.01% | 16.47% | -12.46% |