PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFRCX vs. TFLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFRCX vs. TFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class C (FFRCX) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFRCX achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than TFLR's 1.94% return.


FFRCX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.11%
6M
1.57%
YTD
1.61%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
5.30%
5Y*
4.35%
10Y*
3.73%
ALL TIME*
3.25%

TFLR

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.63%
6M
1.75%
YTD
1.94%
1Y
4.91%
3Y*
7.37%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$4.37M$3.92M$4.00M

FFRCX vs. TFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
FFRCX
Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class C
1.61%4.38%6.18%10.70%0.43%
TFLR
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF
1.94%6.57%8.77%12.05%-0.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FFRCX and TFLR is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2022

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFRCX vs. TFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFRCX
FFRCX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FFRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
FFRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

TFLR
TFLR Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
TFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
TFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFRCX vs. TFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class C (FFRCX) and T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFRCXTFLRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.56

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.80

2.27

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.25

10.31

-1.06

FFRCX vs. TFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFRCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is comparable to the TFLR Sharpe Ratio of 2.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFRCX and TFLR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFRCX vs. TFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFRCX drawdown since its inception was -22.31%, which is greater than TFLR's maximum drawdown of -4.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFRCX and TFLR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFRCXTFLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.31%

-4.01%

-18.30%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.33%

-2.18%

+0.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.37%

-4.01%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.11%

-0.11%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.12%

-0.21%

-0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.41%

0.48%

-0.07%

Volatility

FFRCX vs. TFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class C (FFRCX) is 0.20%, while T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF (TFLR) has a volatility of 0.48%. This indicates that FFRCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFRCXTFLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.20%

0.48%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.57%

1.76%

-0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.13%

2.01%

+0.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.71%

3.61%

-0.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.02%

3.61%

+0.41%

FFRCX vs. TFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFRCX has a 1.73% expense ratio, which is higher than TFLR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFRCX vs. TFLR - Dividend Comparison

FFRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.43%, less than TFLR's 6.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFRCX
Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class C
5.43%6.37%6.09%6.56%2.98%1.86%2.83%4.11%3.64%3.02%3.35%2.70%
TFLR
T. Rowe Price Floating Rate ETF
6.68%6.93%8.18%7.76%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFRCX and TFLR have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TFLR has higher volatility (0.48%) compared to FFRCX (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFRCX dropped -22.31% vs TFLR's -4.01%.

TFLR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.46 vs 1.80), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFRCX and TFLR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer