FFRAX vs. PDBAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FFRAX (Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A) and PDBAX (PGIM Total Return Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - FFRAX is a High Yield Bonds fund managed by Fidelity, while PDBAX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund managed by PGIM. Over the past 10 years, FFRAX returned 4.57%/yr vs 2.47%/yr for PDBAX. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FFRAX charges 0.98%/yr vs 0.76%/yr for PDBAX.

Performance

FFRAX vs. PDBAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A (FFRAX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFRAX achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly higher than PDBAX's 0.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FFRAX has outperformed PDBAX with an annualized return of 4.57%, while PDBAX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.47% annualized return.

FFRAX

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.75%
• YTD: 1.82%
• 6M: 2.43%
• 1Y: 5.82%
• 3Y*: 7.04%
• 5Y*: 5.02%
• 10Y*: 4.57%

PDBAX

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.55%
• YTD: 0.53%
• 6M: 0.48%
• 1Y: 5.96%
• 3Y*: 4.53%
• 5Y*: 0.34%
• 10Y*: 2.47%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFRAX vs. PDBAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFRAX Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A	1.82%	5.28%	6.83%	11.35%	-1.77%	4.83%	1.38%	8.19%	-0.09%	3.52%
PDBAX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund	0.53%	7.50%	1.82%	6.51%	-14.52%	-1.77%	7.78%	14.71%	-0.97%	6.30%

Correlation

The correlation between FFRAX and PDBAX is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.15
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.14
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2000	0.13

Return for Risk

FFRAX vs. PDBAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFRAX

FFRAX Risk / Return Rank: 89
FFRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
FFRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
FFRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 96
FFRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FFRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

PDBAX

PDBAX Risk / Return Rank: 24
PDBAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 23
PDBAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
PDBAX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
PDBAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
PDBAX Martin Ratio Rank: 22

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFRAX vs. PDBAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A (FFRAX) and PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFRAX	PDBAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.45	1.36	+1.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.63	2.06	+3.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.85	1.25	+0.60
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.82	1.95	+2.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.31	5.73	+11.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFRAX vs. PDBAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFRAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.45, which is higher than the PDBAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFRAX and PDBAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFRAX	PDBAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.45	1.36	+1.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.75	0.06	+1.70
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.11	0.46	+0.65
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.17	1.09	+0.08

Drawdowns

FFRAX vs. PDBAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFRAX drawdown since its inception was -22.21%, roughly equal to the maximum PDBAX drawdown of -21.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFRAX and PDBAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFRAX	PDBAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.21%	-21.24%	-0.97%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.21%	-3.07%	+1.86%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.31%	-5.99%	+2.68%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-6.02%	-21.01%	+14.99%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-22.21%	-21.24%	-0.97%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.11%	-1.59%	+1.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.03%	-2.47%	+1.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.34%	1.04%	-0.70%

Volatility

FFRAX vs. PDBAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A (FFRAX) is 0.59%, while PGIM Total Return Bond Fund (PDBAX) has a volatility of 2.09%. This indicates that FFRAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PDBAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFRAX	PDBAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.59%	2.09%	-1.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.72%	3.31%	-1.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.38%	4.40%	-2.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2.88%	6.04%	-3.16%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.13%	5.35%	-1.22%

FFRAX vs. PDBAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFRAX has a 0.98% expense ratio, which is higher than PDBAX's 0.76% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFRAX vs. PDBAX - Dividend Comparison

FFRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.78%, more than PDBAX's 4.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFRAX Fidelity Advisor Floating Rate High Income Fund Class A	6.78%	7.12%	6.69%	7.24%	3.57%	2.47%	3.56%	4.86%	4.42%	3.77%	4.14%	3.42%
PDBAX PGIM Total Return Bond Fund	4.31%	4.27%	3.76%	3.55%	5.49%	2.47%	2.68%	10.32%	3.74%	2.60%	3.65%	2.94%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFRAX and PDBAX in my portfolio?

FFRAX and PDBAX have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFRAX or PDBAX?

PDBAX has higher volatility (2.09%) compared to FFRAX (0.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFRAX dropped -22.21% vs PDBAX's -21.24%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.