FFOG vs. FLIN
FFOG (Franklin Focused Growth ETF) and FLIN (Franklin FTSE India ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFOG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FLIN is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE India RIC Capped Index. FFOG is actively managed, while FLIN is passively managed. Over the past year, FFOG returned 23.96% vs -11.63% for FLIN. At a 0.33 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FFOG charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLIN.
Performance
FFOG vs. FLIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFOG achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly higher than FLIN's -11.92% return.
FFOG
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 5.98%
- YTD
- 10.66%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- 23.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLIN
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -2.58%
- YTD
- -11.92%
- 6M
- -10.85%
- 1Y
- -11.63%
- 3Y*
- 5.53%
- 5Y*
- 3.56%
- 10Y*
- —
FFOG vs. FLIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FFOG Franklin Focused Growth ETF | 10.66% | 17.09% | 38.20% | 12.41% |
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | -11.92% | 2.40% | 10.33% | 11.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFOG and FLIN is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023 | 0.33 |
FFOG vs. FLIN - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FFOG
FLIN
Technology
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Utilities
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
FFOG
FLIN
Consumer Cyclical
FFOG
FLIN
Communication Services
FFOG
FLIN
Healthcare
FFOG
FLIN
Industrials
FFOG
FLIN
Financial Services
FFOG
FLIN
Utilities
FFOG
FLIN
Energy
FFOG
FLIN
Basic Materials
FFOG
-
FLIN
Consumer Defensive
FFOG
-
FLIN
Real Estate
FFOG
-
FLIN
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFOG vs. FLIN — Risk / Return Rank
FFOG
FLIN
FFOG vs. FLIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Focused Growth ETF (FFOG) and Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFOG | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 0.88 | +0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | -0.62 | +1.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.25 | -1.54 | +4.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFOG | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | -0.78 | +1.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.23 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 0.26 | +1.06 |
Drawdowns
FFOG vs. FLIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFOG drawdown since its inception was -25.38%, smaller than the maximum FLIN drawdown of -41.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFOG and FLIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFOG | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.38% | -41.90% | +16.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.90% | -18.79% | -3.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.85% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -18.91% | +17.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.59% | -8.01% | +3.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.39% | 7.57% | -0.18% |
Volatility
FFOG vs. FLIN - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Focused Growth ETF (FFOG) is 4.75%, while Franklin FTSE India ETF (FLIN) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that FFOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFOG | FLIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | 5.21% | -0.46% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.44% | 12.81% | +2.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.03% | 14.92% | +5.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.79% | 15.74% | +8.05% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.79% | 20.45% | +3.34% |
FFOG vs. FLIN - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFOG has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FLIN's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFOG vs. FLIN - Dividend Comparison
FFOG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FLIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFOG Franklin Focused Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FLIN Franklin FTSE India ETF | 0.64% | 0.56% | 1.58% | 0.73% | 0.73% | 2.26% | 0.68% | 0.90% | 0.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFOG and FLIN have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLIN has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to FFOG (4.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFOG dropped -25.38% vs FLIN's -41.90%.
On 1-year performance, FFOG leads with 23.96% vs -11.63% for FLIN. On fees, FLIN is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, FFOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FFOG has performed better with a 23.96% return vs -11.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLIN is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for FFOG.
FLIN has the higher dividend yield at 0.64%, compared with 0.00% for FFOG.
FFOG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FLIN is Asia Pacific Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for FFOG and 0.19% for FLIN.
FFOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs -0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFOG and FLIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer