FFOG vs. FAIR.L
FFOG (Franklin Focused Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton, while FAIR.L (Fair Oaks Income Limited) is a stock. Over the past year, FFOG returned 23.96% vs 231.21% for FAIR.L. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
FFOG vs. FAIR.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFOG achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly lower than FAIR.L's 40.25% return.
FFOG
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- 5.98%
- YTD
- 10.66%
- 6M
- 9.70%
- 1Y
- 23.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAIR.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 7.32%
- YTD
- 40.25%
- 6M
- 37.39%
- 1Y
- 231.21%
- 3Y*
- 404.35%
- 5Y*
- 472.10%
- 10Y*
- 142.07%
FFOG vs. FAIR.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FFOG Franklin Focused Growth ETF | 10.66% | 17.09% | 38.20% | 12.41% |
FAIR.L Fair Oaks Income Limited | 40.25% | 458.44% | 455.50% | 64.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFOG and FAIR.L is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2023 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFOG vs. FAIR.L — Risk / Return Rank
FFOG
FAIR.L
FFOG vs. FAIR.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Focused Growth ETF (FFOG) and Fair Oaks Income Limited (FAIR.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFOG | FAIR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.05 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -6.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 2.89 | -1.68 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.10 | 9.77 | -8.67 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.25 | 27.91 | -24.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFOG | FAIR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 2.25 | -1.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 3.97 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.60 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.32 | 1.32 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
FFOG vs. FAIR.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFOG drawdown since its inception was -25.38%, smaller than the maximum FAIR.L drawdown of -75.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFOG and FAIR.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFOG | FAIR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.38% | -75.06% | +49.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.90% | -23.50% | +1.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.50% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -74.88% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.97% | -17.90% | +16.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.59% | -12.97% | +8.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.39% | 8.24% | -0.85% |
Volatility
FFOG vs. FAIR.L - Volatility Comparison
Franklin Focused Growth ETF (FFOG) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to Fair Oaks Income Limited (FAIR.L) at 3.74%. This indicates that FFOG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAIR.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFOG | FAIR.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | 3.74% | +1.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.44% | 50.77% | -35.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.03% | 101.97% | -81.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.79% | 118.75% | -94.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.79% | 88.45% | -64.66% |
Dividends
FFOG vs. FAIR.L - Dividend Comparison
FFOG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FAIR.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 148.60%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAIR.L Fair Oaks Income Limited | 148.60% | 166.67% | 148.15% | 145.45% | 193.88% | 116.47% |
FFOG Franklin Focused Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFOG and FAIR.L have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FFOG and FAIR.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer