PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFNOX vs. TIP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFNOX vs. TIP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund (FFNOX) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFNOX achieves a 9.53% return, which is significantly higher than TIP's 1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, FFNOX has outperformed TIP with an annualized return of 11.23%, while TIP has yielded a comparatively lower 2.53% annualized return.


FFNOX

1D
2.29%
1M
0.19%
YTD
9.53%
6M
10.17%
1Y
23.58%
3Y*
17.14%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
11.23%

TIP

1D
0.01%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
1.40%
6M
1.42%
1Y
4.76%
3Y*
4.00%
5Y*
0.91%
10Y*
2.53%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFNOX vs. TIP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFNOX
Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund
9.53%20.18%13.05%19.29%-18.02%17.05%16.30%25.09%-6.58%17.09%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
1.40%6.77%1.65%3.80%-12.26%5.68%10.84%8.35%-1.42%2.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FFNOX and TIP is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2003

-0.03

The correlation between FFNOX and TIP shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (all time) to 0.33 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFNOX vs. TIP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFNOX
FFNOX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FFNOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFNOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFNOX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FFNOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFNOX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

TIP
TIP Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
TIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIP Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIP Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFNOX vs. TIP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund (FFNOX) and iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFNOXTIPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.24

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.64

2.34

+0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.26

7.00

+4.26

FFNOX vs. TIP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFNOX Sharpe Ratio is 1.92, which is higher than the TIP Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFNOX and TIP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFNOX vs. TIP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFNOX drawdown since its inception was -49.84%, which is greater than TIP's maximum drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFNOX and TIP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFNOXTIPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.84%

-14.57%

-35.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.60%

-1.98%

-6.62%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.10%

-4.54%

-9.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-14.51%

-11.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.93%

-14.51%

-15.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-0.46%

-1.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.69%

-3.43%

-5.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.01%

0.66%

+1.35%

Volatility

FFNOX vs. TIP - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund (FFNOX) has a higher volatility of 4.83% compared to iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) at 1.03%. This indicates that FFNOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TIP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFNOXTIPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.83%

1.03%

+3.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.79%

2.32%

+7.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.81%

3.39%

+8.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.86%

6.21%

+7.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.61%

5.74%

+8.87%

FFNOX vs. TIP - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFNOX has a 0.11% expense ratio, which is lower than TIP's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FFNOX vs. TIP - Dividend Comparison

FFNOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.35%, less than TIP's 3.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFNOX
Fidelity Multi-Asset Index Fund
2.35%3.68%6.43%3.18%7.14%5.71%2.87%2.96%2.90%0.64%2.50%0.70%
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
3.76%3.46%2.52%2.73%6.96%4.28%1.17%1.75%2.71%2.07%1.48%0.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFNOX and TIP have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFNOX has higher volatility (4.83%) compared to TIP (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFNOX dropped -49.84% vs TIP's -14.57%.

FFNOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFNOX and TIP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer