PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFND vs. ALTL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FFND vs. ALTL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Future Fund Active ETF (FFND) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FFND vs. ALTL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FFND
The Future Fund Active ETF
-3.34%19.38%24.05%40.05%-39.84%-4.81%
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
2.74%16.61%12.30%-15.85%-10.67%6.62%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFND achieves a -3.34% return, which is significantly lower than ALTL's 2.74% return.


FFND

1D
0.81%
1M
-5.25%
YTD
-3.34%
6M
-2.27%
1Y
17.41%
3Y*
19.48%
5Y*
10Y*

ALTL

1D
0.34%
1M
-5.11%
YTD
2.74%
6M
3.20%
1Y
27.97%
3Y*
6.37%
5Y*
3.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFND vs. ALTL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFND has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than ALTL's 0.60% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FFND vs. ALTL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFND
FFND Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFND Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
FFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFND Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

ALTL
ALTL Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
ALTL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALTL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALTL Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
ALTL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALTL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFND vs. ALTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Future Fund Active ETF (FFND) and Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFNDALTLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.98

1.51

-0.53

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.49

2.06

-0.57

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.28

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

2.85

-1.42

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.14

9.84

-3.71

FFND vs. ALTL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFND Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the ALTL Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFND and ALTL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFNDALTLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

1.51

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.12

0.62

-0.50

Correlation

The correlation between FFND and ALTL is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

FFND vs. ALTL - Dividend Comparison

FFND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%, less than ALTL's 1.07% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
FFND
The Future Fund Active ETF
0.67%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.00%
ALTL
Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF
1.07%0.95%1.56%1.28%1.23%1.06%0.75%

Drawdowns

FFND vs. ALTL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFND drawdown since its inception was -47.84%, which is greater than ALTL's maximum drawdown of -31.91%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFND and ALTL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FFNDALTLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.84%

-31.91%

-15.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.23%

-9.79%

-2.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.06%

-5.11%

-1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.44%

-11.84%

-7.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.85%

2.83%

+0.02%

Volatility

FFND vs. ALTL - Volatility Comparison

The Future Fund Active ETF (FFND) has a higher volatility of 5.90% compared to Pacer Lunt Large Cap Alternator ETF (ALTL) at 3.01%. This indicates that FFND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FFNDALTLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.90%

3.01%

+2.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.78%

13.21%

-3.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.76%

18.57%

-0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.34%

18.21%

+7.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.34%

20.10%

+5.24%