FFLV vs. YCS
FFLV (Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF) and YCS (ProShares UltraShort Yen) are both exchange-traded funds - FFLV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while YCS is a Leveraged Currency fund tracking the USD/JPY Exchange Rate (-200%). FFLV is actively managed, while YCS is passively managed. Over the past year, FFLV returned 27.22% vs 32.82% for YCS. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. FFLV charges 0.38%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for YCS.
Performance
FFLV vs. YCS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFLV achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly higher than YCS's 7.17% return.
FFLV
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 2.24%
- YTD
- 11.22%
- 6M
- 12.86%
- 1Y
- 27.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
YCS
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- 4.42%
- YTD
- 7.17%
- 6M
- 10.05%
- 1Y
- 32.82%
- 3Y*
- 19.84%
- 5Y*
- 23.54%
- 10Y*
- 12.34%
FFLV vs. YCS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FFLV Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF | 11.22% | 16.04% | 8.04% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 7.17% | 9.04% | 16.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFLV and YCS is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2024 | -0.08 |
The correlation between FFLV and YCS shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to -0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFLV vs. YCS — Risk / Return Rank
FFLV
YCS
FFLV vs. YCS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFLV | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.49 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.35 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.78 | 3.97 | -0.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.71 | 12.40 | +2.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFLV | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.41 | 1.92 | +0.49 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.65 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.12 | 0.33 | +0.79 |
Drawdowns
FFLV vs. YCS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFLV drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, smaller than the maximum YCS drawdown of -49.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLV and YCS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFLV | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.71% | -49.56% | +32.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.24% | -8.30% | +1.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -27.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.27% | 0.00% | -0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.00% | -19.93% | +16.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.86% | 2.66% | -0.80% |
Volatility
FFLV vs. YCS - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) and ProShares UltraShort Yen (YCS) have volatilities of 2.79% and 2.75%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFLV | YCS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.79% | 2.75% | +0.04% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.40% | 12.32% | -3.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.38% | 17.27% | -5.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 21.10% | -6.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.22% | 19.01% | -4.79% |
FFLV vs. YCS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFLV has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than YCS's 1.00% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFLV vs. YCS - Dividend Comparison
FFLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, while YCS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FFLV Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF | 1.46% | 1.60% | 1.46% |
YCS ProShares UltraShort Yen | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFLV and YCS have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFLV has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to YCS (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFLV dropped -16.71% vs YCS's -49.56%.
On 1-year performance, YCS leads with 32.82% vs 27.22% for FFLV. On fees, FFLV is cheaper at 0.38% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, YCS has performed better with a 32.82% return vs 27.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FFLV is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for YCS.
FFLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.46%, compared with 0.00% for YCS.
FFLV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while YCS is Leveraged Currency. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FFLV and 1.00% for YCS.
FFLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFLV and YCS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer