PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFLV vs. GSY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFLV vs. GSY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) and Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF (GSY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLV achieves a 11.22% return, which is significantly higher than GSY's 1.59% return.


FFLV

1D
-0.24%
1M
2.24%
YTD
11.22%
6M
12.86%
1Y
27.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GSY

1D
0.00%
1M
0.36%
YTD
1.59%
6M
1.96%
1Y
4.54%
3Y*
5.45%
5Y*
3.65%
10Y*
2.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFLV vs. GSY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FFLV
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
11.22%16.04%8.04%
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
1.59%4.96%5.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FFLV and GSY is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2024

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFLV vs. GSY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLV
FFLV Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
FFLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFLV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FFLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFLV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

GSY
GSY Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
GSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
GSY Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
GSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
GSY Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFLV vs. GSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) and Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF (GSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFLVGSYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-9.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-26.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

7.01

-5.59

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.78

76.07

-72.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.71

397.70

-382.99

FFLV vs. GSY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLV Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is lower than the GSY Sharpe Ratio of 11.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLV and GSY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFLVGSYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

11.52

-9.11

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

6.29

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

2.35

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.12

0.46

+0.66

Drawdowns

FFLV vs. GSY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLV drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, which is greater than GSY's maximum drawdown of -12.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLV and GSY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFLVGSYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.71%

-12.14%

-4.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.24%

-0.06%

-7.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.27%

0.00%

-0.27%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.00%

-2.39%

-0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.86%

0.01%

+1.85%

Volatility

FFLV vs. GSY - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) has a higher volatility of 2.79% compared to Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF (GSY) at 0.14%. This indicates that FFLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFLVGSYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.79%

0.14%

+2.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.40%

0.29%

+8.11%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.38%

0.40%

+10.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.22%

0.58%

+13.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.22%

1.22%

+13.00%

FFLV vs. GSY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLV has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than GSY's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFLV vs. GSY - Dividend Comparison

FFLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.46%, less than GSY's 4.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFLV
Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF
1.46%1.60%1.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
4.34%4.56%5.31%4.95%1.70%0.58%1.45%2.71%2.30%1.80%1.21%1.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFLV and GSY have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFLV has higher volatility (2.79%) compared to GSY (0.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFLV dropped -16.71% vs GSY's -12.14%.

On 1-year performance, FFLV leads with 27.22% vs 4.54% for GSY. On fees, GSY is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, GSY has been the lower-risk option at 0.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FFLV has performed better with a 27.22% return vs 4.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GSY is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FFLV.

GSY has the higher dividend yield at 4.34%, compared with 1.46% for FFLV.

FFLV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while GSY is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FFLV and 0.22% for GSY.

GSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (11.52 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFLV and GSY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer