FFLV vs. FELV

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FFLV (Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF) and FELV (Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds from Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FFLV returned 33.97% vs 36.79% for FELV. Their correlation of 0.93 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FFLV charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for FELV.

Performance

FFLV vs. FELV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLV achieves a 19.24% return, which is significantly lower than FELV's 23.19% return.

FFLV

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: 3.63%
• 6M: 13.59%
• YTD: 19.24%
• 1Y: 33.97%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 13.94%

FELV

• 1D: 0.93%
• 1M: 4.23%
• 6M: 17.57%
• YTD: 23.19%
• 1Y: 36.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FELV Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF	$8.12M	$7.54M	$6.16M
FFLV Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF	$226.71K	$143.42K	$105.18K

FFLV vs. FELV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FFLV Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF	19.24%	16.04%	-0.71%
FELV Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF	23.19%	15.80%	11.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FFLV and FELV is 0.93, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 26, 2024	0.93

The correlation between FFLV and FELV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFLV vs. FELV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFLV

FFLV Risk / Return Rank: 95
FFLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FFLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FFLV Omega Ratio Rank: 94
FFLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
FFLV Martin Ratio Rank: 94

FELV

FELV Risk / Return Rank: 96
FELV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FELV Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FELV Omega Ratio Rank: 96
FELV Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
FELV Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFLV vs. FELV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFLV	FELV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.02	3.33	-0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.28	4.56	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.61	-0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.71	5.39	-0.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	18.97	23.57	-4.60

FFLV vs. FELV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLV Sharpe Ratio is 3.02, which is comparable to the FELV Sharpe Ratio of 3.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLV and FELV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFLV vs. FELV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLV drawdown since its inception was -16.71%, roughly equal to the maximum FELV drawdown of -16.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLV and FELV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFLV	FELV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.71%	-16.08%	-0.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.24%	-6.85%	-0.39%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.37%	-1.97%	-1.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.80%	1.56%	+0.24%

Volatility

FFLV vs. FELV - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF (FFLV) has a higher volatility of 2.89% compared to Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF (FELV) at 2.38%. This indicates that FFLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FELV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFLV	FELV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.89%	2.38%	+0.51%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.36%	8.47%	-0.11%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.33%	11.14%	+0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.93%	13.31%	+1.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.93%	13.31%	+1.62%

FFLV vs. FELV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLV has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FELV's 0.18% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFLV vs. FELV - Dividend Comparison

FFLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, less than FELV's 1.40% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
FELV Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF	1.40%	1.67%	2.02%	0.04%
FFLV Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Value ETF	1.35%	1.60%	1.46%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFLV and FELV in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, FFLV and FELV move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FFLV or FELV?

FFLV has higher volatility (2.89%) compared to FELV (2.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFLV dropped -16.71% vs FELV's -16.08%.

Which ETF is better, FFLV or FELV?

On 1-year performance, FELV leads with 36.79% vs 33.97% for FFLV. On fees, FELV is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, FELV has been the lower-risk option at 2.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FFLV or FELV?

Over the 1-year period, FELV has performed better with a 36.79% return vs 33.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFLV or FELV?

FELV is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for FFLV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFLV or FELV?

FELV has the higher dividend yield at 1.40%, compared with 1.35% for FFLV.

What is the main difference between FFLV and FELV?

Their fees differ too: 0.38% for FFLV and 0.18% for FELV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FELV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 3.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.