FFLS vs. BTAL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FFLS (The Future Fund Long/Short ETF) and BTAL (AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund) are both Long-Short funds. FFLS is actively managed, while BTAL is passively managed. Over the past year, FFLS returned -0.45% vs -37.06% for BTAL. At a correlation of -0.51, they often move in opposite directions. FFLS charges 1.75%/yr vs 2.11%/yr for BTAL.

Performance

FFLS vs. BTAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS) and AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLS achieves a -0.26% return, which is significantly higher than BTAL's -19.67% return.

FFLS

• 1D: -0.63%
• 1M: 2.89%
• YTD: -0.26%
• 6M: -0.66%
• 1Y: -0.45%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTAL

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -6.55%
• YTD: -19.67%
• 6M: -18.88%
• 1Y: -37.06%
• 3Y*: -12.64%
• 5Y*: -4.56%
• 10Y*: -4.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFLS vs. BTAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FFLS The Future Fund Long/Short ETF	-0.26%	7.49%	17.71%	2.03%
BTAL AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund	-19.67%	-20.17%	12.83%	-6.80%

Correlation

The correlation between FFLS and BTAL is -0.40, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.40
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2023	-0.51

The correlation between FFLS and BTAL shifts across timeframes, from -0.51 (all time) to -0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FFLS vs. BTAL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FFLS	BTAL
Technology	14.4%	19.5%
Healthcare	10.1%	10.2%
Industrials	8.4%	13.7%
Communication Services	7.2%	3.4%
Consumer Cyclical	6.9%	12.8%
Energy	4.8%	4.4%
Real Estate	2.6%	6.2%
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	5.6%
Basic Materials	-	4.0%
Utilities	-	5.2%
Financial Services	-4.2%	14.9%

Return for Risk

FFLS vs. BTAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLS

FFLS Risk / Return Rank: 8
FFLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
FFLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
FFLS Omega Ratio Rank: 7
FFLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
FFLS Martin Ratio Rank: 8

BTAL

BTAL Risk / Return Rank: 0
BTAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
BTAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
BTAL Omega Ratio Rank: 0
BTAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
BTAL Martin Ratio Rank: 0

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFLS vs. BTAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS) and AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFLS	BTAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.05	-1.72	+1.67
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.01	-2.70	+2.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.00	0.72	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.04	-0.99	+0.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.09	-1.72	+1.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFLS vs. BTAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLS Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is higher than the BTAL Sharpe Ratio of -1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLS and BTAL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFLS	BTAL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05	-1.72	+1.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.24	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	-0.28	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.80	-0.24	+1.04

Drawdowns

FFLS vs. BTAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLS drawdown since its inception was -11.05%, smaller than the maximum BTAL drawdown of -50.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLS and BTAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFLS	BTAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.05%	-50.28%	+39.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.05%	-37.50%	+26.45%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-45.16%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.16%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-50.28%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.96%	-49.93%	+44.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.09%	-21.95%	+18.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.07%	21.54%	-16.47%

Volatility

FFLS vs. BTAL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS) is 3.54%, while AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund (BTAL) has a volatility of 7.54%. This indicates that FFLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFLS	BTAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.54%	7.54%	-4.00%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.92%	15.38%	-8.46%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.94%	21.59%	-12.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.23%	18.75%	-7.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.23%	17.23%	-6.00%

FFLS vs. BTAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLS has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is lower than BTAL's 2.11% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFLS vs. BTAL - Dividend Comparison

FFLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.59%, more than BTAL's 3.10% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BTAL AGFiQ US Market Neutral Anti-Beta Fund	3.10%	2.49%	3.49%	6.14%	1.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.88%	0.39%
FFLS The Future Fund Long/Short ETF	6.59%	6.58%	3.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFLS and BTAL in my portfolio?

FFLS and BTAL have a correlation of -0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFLS or BTAL?

BTAL has higher volatility (7.54%) compared to FFLS (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFLS dropped -11.05% vs BTAL's -50.28%.

Which ETF is better, FFLS or BTAL?

On 1-year performance, FFLS leads with -0.45% vs -37.06% for BTAL. On fees, FFLS is cheaper at 1.75% per year. On volatility, FFLS has been the lower-risk option at 3.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FFLS or BTAL?

Over the 1-year period, FFLS has performed better with a -0.45% return vs -37.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FFLS or BTAL?

FFLS is cheaper with a 1.75% expense ratio, compared with 2.11% for BTAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FFLS or BTAL?

FFLS has the higher dividend yield at 6.59%, compared with 3.10% for BTAL.

What is the main difference between FFLS and BTAL?

They also come from different issuers: The Future Fund and AGF. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for FFLS and 2.11% for BTAL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.05 vs -1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.