PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFIV vs. PHM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FFIV vs. PHM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV) and PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFIV achieves a 55.20% return, which is significantly higher than PHM's 5.26% return. Over the past 10 years, FFIV has underperformed PHM with an annualized return of 12.87%, while PHM has yielded a comparatively higher 22.20% annualized return.


FFIV

1D
0.59%
1M
10.84%
YTD
55.20%
6M
50.82%
1Y
35.83%
3Y*
38.11%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*
12.87%

PHM

1D
-0.67%
1M
9.03%
YTD
5.26%
6M
-2.17%
1Y
19.21%
3Y*
19.48%
5Y*
18.86%
10Y*
22.20%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFIV vs. PHM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFIV
F5 Networks, Inc.
55.20%1.51%40.50%24.72%-41.36%39.09%25.99%-13.81%23.48%-9.33%
PHM
PulteGroup, Inc.
5.26%8.54%6.22%128.76%-19.22%34.03%12.55%51.33%-20.76%83.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FFIV and PHM is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 1999

0.29

The correlation between FFIV and PHM shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.37 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FFIV:

$22.70B

PHM:

$23.88B

EPS

FFIV:

$12.19

PHM:

$10.36

PE Ratio

FFIV:

32.50

PHM:

11.88

PEG Ratio

FFIV:

1.42

PHM:

0.84

PS Ratio

FFIV:

9.54

PHM:

1.44

PB Ratio

FFIV:

6.22

PHM:

1.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

FFIV:

$2.41B

PHM:

$16.83B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FFIV:

$2.63B

PHM:

$4.39B

EBITDA (TTM)

FFIV:

$889.95M

PHM:

$2.76B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFIV vs. PHM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFIV
FFIV Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
FFIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFIV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FFIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

PHM
PHM Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
PHM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHM Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
PHM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHM Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFIV vs. PHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV) and PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFIVPHMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.45

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.13

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.04

0.85

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.28

1.66

+0.62

FFIV vs. PHM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFIV Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is higher than the PHM Sharpe Ratio of 0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFIV and PHM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFIV vs. PHM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFIV drawdown since its inception was -97.59%, which is greater than PHM's maximum drawdown of -92.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFIV and PHM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFIVPHMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-97.59%

-92.40%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.73%

-22.60%

-12.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.73%

-38.01%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.42%

-38.01%

-9.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.59%

-62.11%

+7.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.17%

-16.36%

+13.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-40.16%

-35.47%

-4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.77%

11.62%

+4.15%

Volatility

FFIV vs. PHM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for F5 Networks, Inc. (FFIV) is 8.89%, while PulteGroup, Inc. (PHM) has a volatility of 9.64%. This indicates that FFIV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFIVPHMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.89%

9.64%

-0.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.72%

23.60%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.48%

34.34%

-0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.97%

34.72%

-4.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.56%

36.49%

-6.93%

Dividends

FFIV vs. PHM - Dividend Comparison

FFIV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PHM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFIV
F5 Networks, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PHM
PulteGroup, Inc.
0.78%0.78%0.75%0.66%1.34%1.00%1.16%1.16%1.46%1.08%1.96%1.85%

Financials

FFIV vs. PHM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between F5 Networks, Inc. and PulteGroup, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B202220232024202520260
3.41B
(FFIV) Total Revenue
(PHM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FFIV and PHM have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PHM has higher volatility (9.64%) compared to FFIV (8.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFIV dropped -97.59% vs PHM's -92.40%.

FFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFIV and PHM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer