FFIKX vs. QQQM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FFIKX (Fidelity Freedom Index 2065 Fund Institutional Premium Class) and QQQM (Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF) are both funds - FFIKX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by Fidelity, while QQQM is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 5 years, FFIKX returned 10.15%/yr vs 18.07%/yr for QQQM. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FFIKX charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QQQM.

Performance

FFIKX vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2065 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFIKX) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFIKX achieves a 12.61% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 21.39% return.

FFIKX

• 1D: 0.41%
• 1M: 5.60%
• YTD: 12.61%
• 6M: 13.55%
• 1Y: 28.72%
• 3Y*: 19.61%
• 5Y*: 10.15%
• 10Y*: —

QQQM

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 10.67%
• YTD: 21.39%
• 6M: 19.75%
• 1Y: 41.98%
• 3Y*: 28.89%
• 5Y*: 18.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFIKX vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FFIKX Fidelity Freedom Index 2065 Fund Institutional Premium Class	12.61%	21.48%	14.23%	19.88%	-18.16%	15.96%	9.56%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	21.39%	20.85%	25.68%	55.01%	-32.52%	27.45%	6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FFIKX and QQQM is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.87
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020	0.87

The correlation between FFIKX and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFIKX vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFIKX

FFIKX Risk / Return Rank: 71
FFIKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
FFIKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
FFIKX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FFIKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FFIKX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

QQQM

QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 74
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 75
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFIKX vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2065 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFIKX) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFIKX	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.49	2.65	-0.16
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.45	3.46	-0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.45	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.21	3.53	-0.31
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	14.25	13.52	+0.73
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFIKX vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFIKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFIKX and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFIKX	QQQM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.49	2.65	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.71	0.82	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	0.85	-0.10

Drawdowns

FFIKX vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFIKX drawdown since its inception was -30.68%, smaller than the maximum QQQM drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFIKX and QQQM.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFIKX	QQQM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.68%	-35.04%	+4.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.08%	-11.96%	+2.88%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.70%	-22.70%	+8.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.22%	-35.04%	+8.82%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.20%	+0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.47%	-8.25%	+2.78%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	3.11%	-1.07%

Volatility

FFIKX vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index 2065 Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFIKX) is 3.60%, while Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) has a volatility of 4.48%. This indicates that FFIKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFIKX	QQQM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.60%	4.48%	-0.88%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.51%	12.05%	-2.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.72%	15.91%	-4.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.41%	22.24%	-7.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.82%	22.12%	-5.30%

FFIKX vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFIKX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FFIKX vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

FFIKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.68%, more than QQQM's 0.41% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FFIKX Fidelity Freedom Index 2065 Fund Institutional Premium Class	1.68%	1.93%	1.92%	1.91%	2.01%	1.80%	1.81%	2.05%
QQQM Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF	0.41%	0.50%	0.61%	0.65%	0.83%	0.40%	0.16%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFIKX and QQQM in my portfolio?

FFIKX and QQQM have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFIKX or QQQM?

QQQM has higher volatility (4.48%) compared to FFIKX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFIKX dropped -30.68% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.