PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFIDX vs. CF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFIDX vs. CF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fund (FFIDX) and CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFIDX achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than CF's 42.89% return. Over the past 10 years, FFIDX has underperformed CF with an annualized return of 15.27%, while CF has yielded a comparatively higher 17.90% annualized return.


FFIDX

1D
1.17%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
1.42%
6M
2.47%
1Y
19.24%
3Y*
20.25%
5Y*
12.27%
10Y*
15.27%

CF

1D
2.74%
1M
-12.58%
YTD
42.89%
6M
39.56%
1Y
11.91%
3Y*
19.07%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
17.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFIDX vs. CF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFIDX
Fidelity Fund
1.42%20.04%27.13%30.93%-25.88%33.22%26.43%33.46%-5.31%23.28%
CF
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
42.89%-7.17%10.08%-4.75%22.29%87.18%-15.76%12.73%5.13%40.24%

Correlation

The correlation between FFIDX and CF is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 11, 2005

0.37

The correlation between FFIDX and CF shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.37 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFIDX vs. CF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFIDX
FFIDX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
FFIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FFIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank

CF
CF Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
CF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CF Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
CF Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CF Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
CF Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFIDX vs. CF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fund (FFIDX) and CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFIDXCFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.11

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.68

0.77

+0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.01

1.35

+5.66

FFIDX vs. CF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFIDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is higher than the CF Sharpe Ratio of 0.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFIDX and CF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFIDX vs. CF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFIDX drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, smaller than the maximum CF drawdown of -76.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFIDX and CF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFIDXCFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.35%

-76.73%

+21.38%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.87%

-24.87%

+14.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.42%

-29.16%

+6.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.33%

-48.36%

+18.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.66%

-60.74%

+30.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.92%

-20.11%

+17.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.85%

-24.92%

+13.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.61%

14.29%

-11.68%

Volatility

FFIDX vs. CF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Fund (FFIDX) is 3.70%, while CF Industries Holdings, Inc. (CF) has a volatility of 9.83%. This indicates that FFIDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFIDXCFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

9.83%

-6.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.48%

35.49%

-26.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.77%

42.20%

-29.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.18%

38.23%

-19.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.43%

40.30%

-20.87%

Dividends

FFIDX vs. CF - Dividend Comparison

FFIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, less than CF's 1.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CF
CF Industries Holdings, Inc.
1.83%2.59%2.34%2.01%1.76%1.70%3.10%2.51%2.76%2.82%3.81%2.94%
FFIDX
Fidelity Fund
1.16%1.18%0.00%2.41%0.67%4.60%2.71%5.41%7.40%11.12%7.01%5.48%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFIDX and CF have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CF has higher volatility (9.83%) compared to FFIDX (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFIDX dropped -55.35% vs CF's -76.73%.

FFIDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.43 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFIDX and CF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer