PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFGZX vs. PLTHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFGZX vs. PLTHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFGZX achieves a 3.32% return, which is significantly lower than PLTHX's 8.52% return. Over the past 10 years, FFGZX has underperformed PLTHX with an annualized return of 4.25%, while PLTHX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.16% annualized return.


FFGZX

1D
-0.47%
1M
0.18%
YTD
3.32%
6M
3.06%
1Y
8.23%
3Y*
7.23%
5Y*
2.97%
10Y*
4.25%

PLTHX

1D
-1.90%
1M
-0.38%
YTD
8.52%
6M
7.65%
1Y
22.00%
3Y*
18.55%
5Y*
9.77%
10Y*
12.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFGZX vs. PLTHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.32%9.13%5.02%8.32%-11.07%2.85%8.59%10.68%-0.80%6.73%
PLTHX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund
8.52%19.91%17.18%20.28%-18.52%20.05%16.11%26.46%-9.93%21.32%

Correlation

The correlation between FFGZX and PLTHX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2015

0.71

The correlation between FFGZX and PLTHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (5 years) to 0.82 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFGZX vs. PLTHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFGZX
FFGZX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
FFGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

PLTHX
PLTHX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
PLTHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PLTHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
PLTHX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
PLTHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
PLTHX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFGZX vs. PLTHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) and Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFGZXPLTHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.34

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

2.75

-0.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.35

12.16

-0.81

FFGZX vs. PLTHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the PLTHX Sharpe Ratio of 1.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGZX and PLTHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFGZX vs. PLTHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGZX drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum PLTHX drawdown of -33.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGZX and PLTHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFGZXPLTHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.94%

-33.26%

+18.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.33%

-8.60%

+5.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.76%

-16.64%

+11.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.94%

-25.49%

+10.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.94%

-33.26%

+18.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.92%

-2.85%

+1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-4.79%

+2.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.77%

1.94%

-1.17%

Volatility

FFGZX vs. PLTHX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) is 1.93%, while Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund (PLTHX) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that FFGZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PLTHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFGZXPLTHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

5.43%

-3.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.71%

10.61%

-6.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.34%

12.83%

-8.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.14%

15.64%

-10.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.46%

15.97%

-11.51%

FFGZX vs. PLTHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGZX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTHX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FFGZX vs. PLTHX - Dividend Comparison

FFGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.24%, less than PLTHX's 4.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.24%3.30%3.18%2.88%3.11%2.10%2.22%7.35%3.00%1.95%1.56%1.06%
PLTHX
Principal LifeTime Hybrid 2060 Fund
4.02%4.37%4.30%2.76%7.91%3.84%2.91%3.67%3.47%2.37%2.20%1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFGZX and PLTHX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PLTHX has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to FFGZX (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGZX dropped -14.94% vs PLTHX's -33.26%.

FFGZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.01 vs 1.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFGZX and PLTHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer