PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFGZX vs. FRQIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFGZX vs. FRQIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FFGZX having a 3.49% return and FRQIX slightly higher at 3.60%. Over the past 10 years, FFGZX has underperformed FRQIX with an annualized return of 4.09%, while FRQIX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.14% annualized return.


FFGZX

1D
0.32%
1M
-0.63%
6M
2.57%
YTD
3.49%
1Y
8.40%
3Y*
7.00%
5Y*
2.85%
10Y*
4.09%

FRQIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
6M
2.60%
YTD
3.60%
1Y
8.55%
3Y*
7.40%
5Y*
2.72%
10Y*
5.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFGZX vs. FRQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.49%9.13%5.02%8.32%-11.07%2.85%8.59%10.68%-0.80%6.73%
FRQIX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I
3.60%9.97%4.48%8.52%-12.39%3.82%9.58%12.63%-2.84%10.64%

Correlation

The correlation between FFGZX and FRQIX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2015

0.92

The correlation between FFGZX and FRQIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFGZX vs. FRQIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFGZX
FFGZX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FFGZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGZX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGZX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

FRQIX
FRQIX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
FRQIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRQIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRQIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FRQIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRQIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFGZX vs. FRQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFGZXFRQIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.38

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

2.39

+0.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.36

9.97

+0.38

FFGZX vs. FRQIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is comparable to the FRQIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGZX and FRQIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFGZX vs. FRQIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGZX drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum FRQIX drawdown of -38.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGZX and FRQIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFGZXFRQIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.94%

-38.01%

+23.07%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.33%

-3.43%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.76%

-5.21%

+0.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.94%

-17.04%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.94%

-17.04%

+2.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.76%

-0.42%

-0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.25%

-4.42%

+2.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.78%

0.82%

-0.04%

Volatility

FFGZX vs. FRQIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class (FFGZX) is 1.50%, while Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) has a volatility of 1.59%. This indicates that FFGZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FRQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFGZXFRQIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

1.59%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.81%

3.66%

+0.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.40%

4.32%

+0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.16%

5.60%

-0.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.46%

5.28%

-0.82%

FFGZX vs. FRQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGZX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FRQIX's 0.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFGZX vs. FRQIX - Dividend Comparison

FFGZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.08%, which matches FRQIX's 3.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFGZX
Fidelity Freedom Index Income Fund Institutional Premium Class
3.08%3.30%3.18%2.88%3.11%2.10%2.22%7.35%3.00%1.95%1.56%1.06%
FRQIX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I
3.09%3.14%2.97%2.75%5.01%6.00%3.51%3.14%5.60%16.32%2.43%4.08%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FFGZX and FRQIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FRQIX has higher volatility (1.59%) compared to FFGZX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGZX dropped -14.94% vs FRQIX's -38.01%.

FRQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFGZX and FRQIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer