PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFGTX vs. VCMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFGTX vs. VCMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) and Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares (VCMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFGTX achieves a 15.68% return, which is significantly higher than VCMDX's 13.42% return.


FFGTX

1D
0.31%
1M
-5.62%
YTD
15.68%
6M
15.02%
1Y
35.84%
3Y*
16.94%
5Y*
12.36%
10Y*
11.95%

VCMDX

1D
-0.77%
1M
-7.67%
YTD
13.42%
6M
12.34%
1Y
21.32%
3Y*
12.04%
5Y*
10.60%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFGTX vs. VCMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FFGTX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M
15.68%27.96%2.37%-5.62%20.06%25.38%5.41%5.39%
VCMDX
Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares
13.42%18.20%5.27%-7.45%13.83%34.82%5.07%2.74%

Correlation

The correlation between FFGTX and VCMDX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2019

0.59

The correlation between FFGTX and VCMDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFGTX vs. VCMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFGTX
FFGTX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FFGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

VCMDX
VCMDX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
VCMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
VCMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFGTX vs. VCMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) and Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares (VCMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFGTXVCMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.24

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.03

1.84

+2.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.49

7.27

+7.22

FFGTX vs. VCMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the VCMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGTX and VCMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFGTX vs. VCMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGTX drawdown since its inception was -58.53%, which is greater than VCMDX's maximum drawdown of -26.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGTX and VCMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFGTXVCMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.53%

-26.67%

-31.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.75%

-10.85%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.63%

-10.85%

-8.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.31%

-25.45%

-1.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.47%

-10.85%

+2.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.32%

-10.83%

-9.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.44%

2.89%

-0.45%

Volatility

FFGTX vs. VCMDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) has a higher volatility of 5.36% compared to Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares (VCMDX) at 3.51%. This indicates that FFGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFGTXVCMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.36%

3.51%

+1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.87%

12.85%

+1.02%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.03%

15.06%

+1.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.40%

15.84%

+5.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.45%

15.37%

+7.08%

FFGTX vs. VCMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGTX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than VCMDX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFGTX vs. VCMDX - Dividend Comparison

FFGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than VCMDX's 13.41% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFGTX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M
1.74%2.02%1.93%1.47%1.47%2.91%1.03%2.51%1.57%0.36%1.05%2.07%
VCMDX
Vanguard Commodity Strategy Fund Admiral Shares
13.41%15.21%2.19%2.50%14.21%30.56%0.50%0.60%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFGTX and VCMDX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFGTX has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to VCMDX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGTX dropped -58.53% vs VCMDX's -26.67%.

FFGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFGTX and VCMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer