FFGTX vs. MCSTX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FFGTX (Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M) and MCSTX (MFS Commodity Strategy Fund Class R4) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 5 years, FFGTX returned 12.36%/yr vs 10.34%/yr for MCSTX. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFGTX charges 1.52%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for MCSTX.

Performance

FFGTX vs. MCSTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) and MFS Commodity Strategy Fund Class R4 (MCSTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FFGTX having a 15.68% return and MCSTX slightly lower at 15.24%.

FFGTX

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -5.62%
• YTD: 15.68%
• 6M: 15.02%
• 1Y: 35.84%
• 3Y*: 16.94%
• 5Y*: 12.36%
• 10Y*: 11.95%

MCSTX

• 1D: -0.95%
• 1M: -7.56%
• YTD: 15.24%
• 6M: 13.97%
• 1Y: 24.92%
• 3Y*: 13.30%
• 5Y*: 10.34%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFGTX vs. MCSTX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FFGTX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M	15.68%	27.96%	2.37%	-5.62%	20.06%	25.38%	5.41%	4.71%
MCSTX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund Class R4	15.24%	18.51%	5.09%	-6.15%	13.37%	27.60%	-0.21%	-1.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FFGTX and MCSTX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.59
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.60
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2019	0.57

The correlation between FFGTX and MCSTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFGTX vs. MCSTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFGTX

FFGTX Risk / Return Rank: 66
FFGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FFGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FFGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FFGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
FFGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

MCSTX

MCSTX Risk / Return Rank: 34
MCSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
MCSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
MCSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 30
MCSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
MCSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFGTX vs. MCSTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) and MFS Commodity Strategy Fund Class R4 (MCSTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFGTX	MCSTX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	1.47	+0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	1.97	+0.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.27	+0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.03	2.27	+1.77
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.49	8.56	+5.93

FFGTX vs. MCSTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGTX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is higher than the MCSTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGTX and MCSTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFGTX vs. MCSTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGTX drawdown since its inception was -58.53%, which is greater than MCSTX's maximum drawdown of -37.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGTX and MCSTX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFGTX	MCSTX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.53%	-37.67%	-20.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.75%	-10.34%	+1.59%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.63%	-10.34%	-9.29%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.31%	-37.67%	+10.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.47%	-10.34%	+1.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.32%	-17.41%	-2.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.44%	2.91%	-0.47%

Volatility

FFGTX vs. MCSTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) has a higher volatility of 5.36% compared to MFS Commodity Strategy Fund Class R4 (MCSTX) at 3.30%. This indicates that FFGTX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCSTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFGTX	MCSTX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.36%	3.30%	+2.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.87%	13.63%	+0.24%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.03%	15.92%	+1.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.40%	34.67%	-13.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.45%	29.91%	-7.46%

FFGTX vs. MCSTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGTX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than MCSTX's 0.91% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFGTX vs. MCSTX - Dividend Comparison

FFGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, less than MCSTX's 13.95% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFGTX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M	1.74%	2.02%	1.93%	1.47%	1.47%	2.91%	1.03%	2.51%	1.57%	0.36%	1.05%	2.07%
MCSTX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund Class R4	13.95%	16.08%	3.30%	2.21%	27.44%	56.14%	0.87%	1.87%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFGTX and MCSTX in my portfolio?

FFGTX and MCSTX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFGTX or MCSTX?

FFGTX has higher volatility (5.36%) compared to MCSTX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGTX dropped -58.53% vs MCSTX's -37.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.