PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
MCSTX vs. MDIJX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

MCSTX vs. MDIJX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MFS Commodity Strategy Fund Class R4 (MCSTX) and MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, MCSTX achieves a 15.24% return, which is significantly higher than MDIJX's 10.05% return.


MCSTX

1D
-0.95%
1M
-7.56%
YTD
15.24%
6M
13.97%
1Y
24.92%
3Y*
13.30%
5Y*
10.34%
10Y*

MDIJX

1D
-0.13%
1M
1.87%
YTD
10.05%
6M
9.81%
1Y
23.07%
3Y*
16.30%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
10.42%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

MCSTX vs. MDIJX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
MCSTX
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund Class R4
15.24%18.51%5.09%-6.15%13.37%27.60%-0.21%-1.04%
MDIJX
MFS International Diversification Fund
10.05%27.84%6.41%14.37%-17.12%7.69%15.26%11.96%

Correlation

The correlation between MCSTX and MDIJX is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2019

0.29

Over the past year, the correlation between MCSTX and MDIJX has dropped to 0.06 - well below their long-term average of 0.29, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

MCSTX vs. MDIJX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

MCSTX
MCSTX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
MCSTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MCSTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
MCSTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
MCSTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
MCSTX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

MDIJX
MDIJX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
MDIJX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MDIJX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
MDIJX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
MDIJX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
MDIJX Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

MCSTX vs. MDIJX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MFS Commodity Strategy Fund Class R4 (MCSTX) and MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


MCSTXMDIJXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.33

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

2.04

+0.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.56

7.68

+0.88

MCSTX vs. MDIJX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current MCSTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is comparable to the MDIJX Sharpe Ratio of 1.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of MCSTX and MDIJX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

MCSTX vs. MDIJX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum MCSTX drawdown since its inception was -37.67%, smaller than the maximum MDIJX drawdown of -56.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MCSTX and MDIJX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


MCSTXMDIJXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.67%

-56.60%

+18.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.34%

-11.40%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.34%

-12.57%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.67%

-30.19%

-7.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.34%

-0.20%

-10.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.41%

-9.08%

-8.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

3.03%

-0.12%

Volatility

MCSTX vs. MDIJX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for MFS Commodity Strategy Fund Class R4 (MCSTX) is 3.30%, while MFS International Diversification Fund (MDIJX) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that MCSTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDIJX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


MCSTXMDIJXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.30%

4.89%

-1.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.63%

11.02%

+2.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.92%

13.12%

+2.80%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

34.67%

14.34%

+20.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.91%

14.70%

+15.21%

MCSTX vs. MDIJX - Expense Ratio Comparison

MCSTX has a 0.91% expense ratio, which is higher than MDIJX's 0.82% expense ratio.


Dividends

MCSTX vs. MDIJX - Dividend Comparison

MCSTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.95%, more than MDIJX's 4.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MCSTX
MFS Commodity Strategy Fund Class R4
13.95%16.08%3.30%2.21%27.44%56.14%0.87%1.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
MDIJX
MFS International Diversification Fund
4.70%5.17%3.50%4.14%2.64%2.70%1.64%2.50%3.14%1.63%2.18%1.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


MCSTX and MDIJX have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MDIJX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to MCSTX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, MCSTX dropped -37.67% vs MDIJX's -56.60%.

MDIJX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.78 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for MCSTX and MDIJX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer