FFGTX vs. FSPSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX).
FFGTX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009. FSPSX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 1997.
Performance
FFGTX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFGTX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFGTX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M | 22.70% | 27.96% | 2.37% | -5.62% | 20.06% | 25.38% | 5.41% | 17.23% | -13.73% | 17.38% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | -1.94% | 31.98% | 3.70% | 18.31% | -14.23% | 11.45% | 8.16% | 22.03% | -13.55% | 25.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFGTX achieves a 22.70% return, which is significantly higher than FSPSX's -1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FFGTX has outperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 13.28%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.65% annualized return.
FFGTX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -1.64%
- YTD
- 22.70%
- 6M
- 30.84%
- 1Y
- 51.60%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- 15.16%
- 10Y*
- 13.28%
FSPSX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -10.86%
- YTD
- -1.94%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 19.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFGTX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFGTX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFGTX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank
FFGTX
FSPSX
FFGTX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFGTX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.52 | 1.11 | +1.41 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.03 | 1.56 | +1.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.48 | 1.23 | +0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.39 | 1.54 | +1.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.47 | 5.93 | +11.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFGTX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.52 | 1.11 | +1.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 | 0.51 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 0.53 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.46 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFGTX and FSPSX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FFGTX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison
FFGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than FSPSX's 3.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFGTX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M | 1.64% | 2.02% | 1.93% | 1.47% | 1.47% | 2.91% | 1.03% | 2.51% | 1.57% | 0.36% | 1.05% | 2.07% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | 3.22% | 3.15% | 3.27% | 2.79% | 2.66% | 3.07% | 1.84% | 3.18% | 2.79% | 2.50% | 3.08% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
FFGTX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFGTX drawdown since its inception was -58.53%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGTX and FSPSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFGTX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.53% | -33.69% | -24.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.66% | -11.39% | -3.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.31% | -29.41% | +2.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.88% | -33.69% | -15.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.37% | -10.86% | +8.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.56% | -6.59% | -13.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 2.96% | -0.11% |
Volatility
FFGTX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) is 6.12%, while Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that FFGTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFGTX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.12% | 7.04% | -0.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.74% | 10.63% | +3.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.50% | 16.79% | +3.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.55% | 15.77% | +5.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 16.47% | +6.07% |