PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFGTX vs. FSPSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFGTX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFGTX achieves a 24.08% return, which is significantly higher than FSPSX's 9.28% return. Over the past 10 years, FFGTX has outperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 12.25%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.35% annualized return.


FFGTX

1D
-0.29%
1M
0.22%
YTD
24.08%
6M
26.83%
1Y
50.63%
3Y*
19.63%
5Y*
12.84%
10Y*
12.25%

FSPSX

1D
0.56%
1M
0.08%
YTD
9.28%
6M
11.68%
1Y
21.70%
3Y*
17.20%
5Y*
8.68%
10Y*
9.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFGTX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFGTX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M
24.08%27.96%2.37%-5.62%20.06%25.38%5.41%17.23%-13.73%17.38%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
9.28%31.98%3.70%18.31%-14.23%11.45%8.16%22.03%-13.55%25.37%

Correlation

The correlation between FFGTX and FSPSX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.70

Over the past year, the correlation between FFGTX and FSPSX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFGTX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFGTX
FFGTX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FFGTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGTX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGTX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FSPSX
FSPSX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FSPSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSPSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSPSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
FSPSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSPSX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFGTX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFGTXFSPSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.87

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.27

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.93

1.91

+5.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

24.87

7.17

+17.70

FFGTX vs. FSPSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGTX Sharpe Ratio is 3.15, which is higher than the FSPSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGTX and FSPSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFGTXFSPSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.15

1.47

+1.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

0.55

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.57

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.50

-0.17

Drawdowns

FFGTX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGTX drawdown since its inception was -58.53%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGTX and FSPSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFGTXFSPSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.53%

-33.69%

-24.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.42%

-11.39%

+3.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.63%

-13.58%

-6.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.31%

-29.41%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.88%

-33.69%

-15.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.83%

-0.66%

-1.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.36%

-6.55%

-13.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.06%

3.03%

-0.97%

Volatility

FFGTX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M (FFGTX) is 4.20%, while Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) has a volatility of 4.46%. This indicates that FFGTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFGTXFSPSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

4.46%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.25%

12.07%

+1.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.33%

14.79%

+1.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.39%

15.98%

+5.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.43%

16.55%

+5.88%

FFGTX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGTX has a 1.52% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFGTX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison

FFGTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.63%, less than FSPSX's 2.89% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFGTX
Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class M
1.63%2.02%1.93%1.47%1.47%2.91%1.03%2.51%1.57%0.36%1.05%2.07%
FSPSX
Fidelity International Index Fund
2.89%3.15%3.27%2.79%2.66%3.07%1.84%3.18%2.79%2.50%3.08%2.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFGTX and FSPSX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FSPSX has higher volatility (4.46%) compared to FFGTX (4.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGTX dropped -58.53% vs FSPSX's -33.69%.

FFGTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.15 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFGTX and FSPSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer