FFGIX vs. DBCMX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FFGIX (Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class I) and DBCMX (DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 10 years, FFGIX returned 12.34%/yr vs 7.58%/yr for DBCMX. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FFGIX charges 0.93%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for DBCMX.

Performance

FFGIX vs. DBCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class I (FFGIX) and DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFGIX achieves a 19.69% return, which is significantly lower than DBCMX's 30.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FFGIX has outperformed DBCMX with an annualized return of 12.34%, while DBCMX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.58% annualized return.

FFGIX

• 1D: -1.17%
• 1M: 6.23%
• 6M: 6.99%
• YTD: 19.69%
• 1Y: 41.72%
• 3Y*: 15.49%
• 5Y*: 13.83%
• 10Y*: 12.34%
• ALL TIME*: 7.59%

DBCMX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 8.92%
• 6M: 26.51%
• YTD: 30.19%
• 1Y: 36.00%
• 3Y*: 9.25%
• 5Y*: 9.52%
• 10Y*: 7.58%
• ALL TIME*: 7.66%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
DBCMX DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FFGIX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FFGIX vs. DBCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFGIX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class I	19.69%	28.57%	2.97%	-5.17%	20.69%	26.14%	6.12%	18.02%	-13.14%	17.29%
DBCMX DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund	30.19%	6.10%	0.45%	-3.96%	13.40%	31.24%	-6.07%	4.78%	-10.65%	9.17%

Correlation

The correlation between FFGIX and DBCMX is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.51
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.57
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016	0.56

The correlation between FFGIX and DBCMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFGIX vs. DBCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFGIX

FFGIX Risk / Return Rank: 86
FFGIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FFGIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FFGIX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FFGIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FFGIX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

DBCMX

DBCMX Risk / Return Rank: 86
DBCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
DBCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
DBCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 83
DBCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
DBCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFGIX vs. DBCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class I (FFGIX) and DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFGIX	DBCMX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.39	2.38	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	3.20	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.41	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.33	2.91	+0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.12	10.75	+0.38

FFGIX vs. DBCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the DBCMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGIX and DBCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFGIX vs. DBCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGIX drawdown since its inception was -57.17%, which is greater than DBCMX's maximum drawdown of -37.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGIX and DBCMX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFGIX	DBCMX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.17%	-37.62%	-19.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.25%	-11.98%	-0.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.27%	-14.75%	-4.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.23%	-27.60%	+0.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.29%	-37.62%	-10.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.48%	-2.89%	-2.59%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.12%	-13.16%	-5.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.66%	3.24%	+0.42%

Volatility

FFGIX vs. DBCMX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class I (FFGIX) and DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund (DBCMX) have volatilities of 4.49% and 4.43%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFGIX	DBCMX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.49%	4.43%	+0.06%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.89%	12.84%	+1.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.13%	14.66%	+2.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.27%	16.24%	+5.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.35%	14.60%	+7.75%

FFGIX vs. DBCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGIX has a 0.93% expense ratio, which is lower than DBCMX's 1.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFGIX vs. DBCMX - Dividend Comparison

FFGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, less than DBCMX's 2.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DBCMX DoubleLine Strategic Commodity Fund	2.33%	3.04%	2.89%	3.30%	46.88%	13.53%	0.00%	1.04%	1.21%	5.23%	0.51%	0.00%
FFGIX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class I	2.03%	2.44%	2.61%	2.08%	1.90%	3.43%	1.53%	3.21%	2.41%	0.36%	1.65%	2.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFGIX and DBCMX in my portfolio?

FFGIX and DBCMX have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFGIX or DBCMX?

FFGIX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to DBCMX (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGIX dropped -57.17% vs DBCMX's -37.62%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFGIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.