FFGCX vs. FSPSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX).
FFGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009. FSPSX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 1997.
Performance
FFGCX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFGCX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund | 22.87% | 28.66% | 2.98% | -5.18% | 20.69% | 26.08% | 6.04% | 17.82% | -13.21% | 17.18% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | -1.94% | 31.98% | 3.70% | 18.31% | -14.23% | 11.45% | 8.16% | 22.03% | -13.55% | 25.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFGCX achieves a 22.87% return, which is significantly higher than FSPSX's -1.94% return. Over the past 10 years, FFGCX has outperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 13.82%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.65% annualized return.
FFGCX
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -1.60%
- YTD
- 22.87%
- 6M
- 31.25%
- 1Y
- 52.48%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- 15.78%
- 10Y*
- 13.82%
FSPSX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -10.86%
- YTD
- -1.94%
- 6M
- 2.58%
- 1Y
- 19.89%
- 3Y*
- 13.50%
- 5Y*
- 7.96%
- 10Y*
- 8.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFGCX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFGCX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFGCX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank
FFGCX
FSPSX
FFGCX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFGCX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.57 | 1.11 | +1.45 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.09 | 1.56 | +1.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 1.23 | +0.26 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 1.54 | +1.91 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.89 | 5.93 | +11.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFGCX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.57 | 1.11 | +1.45 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 | 0.51 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | 0.53 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.46 | -0.11 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFGCX and FSPSX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FFGCX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison
FFGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.06%, less than FSPSX's 3.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund | 2.06% | 2.53% | 2.62% | 2.01% | 1.84% | 3.39% | 1.61% | 2.98% | 2.22% | 0.36% | 1.53% | 2.86% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | 3.22% | 3.15% | 3.27% | 2.79% | 2.66% | 3.07% | 1.84% | 3.18% | 2.79% | 2.50% | 3.08% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
FFGCX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFGCX drawdown since its inception was -57.23%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGCX and FSPSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFGCX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.23% | -33.69% | -23.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.64% | -11.39% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.22% | -29.41% | +2.19% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.43% | -33.69% | -14.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.30% | -10.86% | +8.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.54% | -6.59% | -12.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.96% | -0.13% |
Volatility
FFGCX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) is 6.10%, while Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) has a volatility of 7.04%. This indicates that FFGCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFGCX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 7.04% | -0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.74% | 10.63% | +3.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.49% | 16.79% | +3.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 15.77% | +5.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 16.47% | +6.07% |