FFGCX vs. FFGAX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FFGCX (Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund) and FFGAX (Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A) are both Commodities funds from Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FFGCX returned 13.04%/yr vs 12.79%/yr for FFGAX. With a 1.00 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FFGCX charges 0.94%/yr vs 1.23%/yr for FFGAX.

Performance

FFGCX vs. FFGAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) and Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A (FFGAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FFGCX having a 24.64% return and FFGAX slightly lower at 24.50%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FFGCX having a 13.04% annualized return and FFGAX not far behind at 12.79%.

FFGCX

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: 0.79%
• YTD: 24.64%
• 6M: 27.09%
• 1Y: 52.31%
• 3Y*: 20.10%
• 5Y*: 13.70%
• 10Y*: 13.04%

FFGAX

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 24.50%
• 6M: 26.92%
• 1Y: 51.82%
• 3Y*: 19.78%
• 5Y*: 13.39%
• 10Y*: 12.79%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFGCX vs. FFGAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund	24.64%	28.66%	2.98%	-5.18%	20.69%	26.08%	6.04%	17.82%	-13.21%	17.18%
FFGAX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A	24.50%	28.27%	2.63%	-5.35%	20.37%	25.70%	5.78%	17.54%	-13.44%	17.38%

Correlation

The correlation between FFGCX and FFGAX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	1.00
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.00
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	1.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2009	1.00

The correlation between FFGCX and FFGAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFGCX vs. FFGAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFGCX

FFGCX Risk / Return Rank: 91
FFGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FFGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
FFGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 82
FFGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FFGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

FFGAX

FFGAX Risk / Return Rank: 90
FFGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
FFGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
FFGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
FFGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FFGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFGCX vs. FFGAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) and Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A (FFGAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFGCX	FFGAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.21	3.18	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.04	4.01	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.54	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.09	7.02	+0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	25.64	25.39	+0.25
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFGCX vs. FFGAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGCX Sharpe Ratio is 3.21, which is comparable to the FFGAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGCX and FFGAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFGCX	FFGAX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.21	3.18	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.63	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	0.57	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.34	+0.01

Drawdowns

FFGCX vs. FFGAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGCX drawdown since its inception was -57.23%, roughly equal to the maximum FFGAX drawdown of -57.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGCX and FFGAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFGCX	FFGAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.23%	-57.71%	+0.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.38%	-7.39%	+0.01%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.24%	-19.46%	+0.22%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.22%	-27.29%	+0.07%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.43%	-48.61%	+0.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.58%	-1.58%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.37%	-19.82%	+0.45%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.04%	2.04%	0.00%

Volatility

FFGCX vs. FFGAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) and Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A (FFGAX) have volatilities of 4.35% and 4.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFGCX	FFGAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.35%	4.36%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.28%	13.28%	0.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.34%	16.36%	-0.02%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.37%	21.39%	-0.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.43%	22.46%	-0.03%

FFGCX vs. FFGAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGCX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is lower than FFGAX's 1.23% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFGCX vs. FFGAX - Dividend Comparison

FFGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.03%, more than FFGAX's 1.80% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFGAX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A	1.80%	2.24%	2.32%	1.79%	1.68%	3.16%	1.30%	2.84%	1.93%	0.36%	1.29%	2.51%
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund	2.03%	2.53%	2.62%	2.01%	1.84%	3.39%	1.61%	2.98%	2.22%	0.36%	1.53%	2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFGCX and FFGAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, FFGCX and FFGAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FFGCX or FFGAX?

FFGAX has higher volatility (4.36%) compared to FFGCX (4.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGCX dropped -57.23% vs FFGAX's -57.71%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFGCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.21 vs 3.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.