FFGCX vs. XLE
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) and Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE).
FFGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009. XLE is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Energy Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FFGCX or XLE.
Correlation
The correlation between FFGCX and XLE is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
FFGCX vs. XLE - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FFGCX:
-0.12
XLE:
0.13
FFGCX:
-0.05
XLE:
0.29
FFGCX:
0.99
XLE:
1.04
FFGCX:
-0.08
XLE:
0.17
FFGCX:
-0.36
XLE:
0.39
FFGCX:
5.44%
XLE:
5.96%
FFGCX:
16.44%
XLE:
17.91%
FFGCX:
-55.11%
XLE:
-71.54%
FFGCX:
-18.52%
XLE:
-13.59%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFGCX achieves a -2.24% return, which is significantly lower than XLE's 2.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FFGCX has outperformed XLE with an annualized return of 5.42%, while XLE has yielded a comparatively lower 4.37% annualized return.
FFGCX
-2.24%
-9.72%
-7.71%
-0.29%
8.68%
5.42%
XLE
2.71%
-12.44%
-3.63%
1.09%
11.81%
4.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFGCX vs. XLE - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFGCX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than XLE's 0.13% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FFGCX vs. XLE - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) and Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FFGCX vs. XLE - Dividend Comparison
FFGCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%.
TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund | 0.00% | 2.01% | 1.84% | 3.39% | 1.61% | 2.98% | 2.06% | 0.99% | 0.93% | 2.86% | 3.07% | 2.75% |
Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund | 2.59% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 5.73% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% | 2.35% | 1.73% |
Drawdowns
FFGCX vs. XLE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFGCX drawdown since its inception was -55.11%, smaller than the maximum XLE drawdown of -71.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGCX and XLE. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FFGCX vs. XLE - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) has a higher volatility of 5.88% compared to Energy Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLE) at 5.06%. This indicates that FFGCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.