FFGCX vs. BCSKX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) and BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K (BCSKX).
FFGCX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 25, 2009. BCSKX is a passively managed fund by BlackRock that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. It was launched on Oct 3, 2011.
Performance
FFGCX vs. BCSKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFGCX vs. BCSKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund | 24.11% | 28.66% | 2.98% | -5.18% | 20.69% | 26.08% | 6.04% | 17.82% | -18.65% |
BCSKX BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K | 20.37% | 28.88% | 4.44% | -4.27% | 11.95% | 22.49% | 6.84% | 3.89% | 2.06% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFGCX achieves a 24.11% return, which is significantly higher than BCSKX's 20.37% return.
FFGCX
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- -1.31%
- YTD
- 24.11%
- 6M
- 33.32%
- 1Y
- 52.87%
- 3Y*
- 18.10%
- 5Y*
- 15.71%
- 10Y*
- 13.94%
BCSKX
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 0.81%
- YTD
- 20.37%
- 6M
- 27.67%
- 1Y
- 41.82%
- 3Y*
- 16.50%
- 5Y*
- 14.27%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFGCX vs. BCSKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFGCX has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than BCSKX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFGCX vs. BCSKX — Risk / Return Rank
FFGCX
BCSKX
FFGCX vs. BCSKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) and BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K (BCSKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFGCX | BCSKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.65 | 2.63 | +0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.17 | 3.31 | -0.14 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.47 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.67 | 4.07 | -0.39 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.00 | 20.58 | -1.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFGCX | BCSKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.65 | 2.63 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 | 0.91 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.62 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.76 | -0.41 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFGCX and BCSKX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FFGCX vs. BCSKX - Dividend Comparison
FFGCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.04%, less than BCSKX's 2.60% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFGCX Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund | 2.04% | 2.53% | 2.62% | 2.01% | 1.84% | 3.39% | 1.61% | 2.98% | 2.22% | 0.36% | 1.53% | 2.86% |
BCSKX BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K | 2.60% | 3.13% | 3.66% | 9.45% | 9.11% | 2.72% | 0.84% | 2.08% | 2.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
FFGCX vs. BCSKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFGCX drawdown since its inception was -57.23%, which is greater than BCSKX's maximum drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGCX and BCSKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFGCX | BCSKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.23% | -30.34% | -26.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.64% | -10.51% | -4.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.22% | -22.34% | -4.88% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -48.43% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.31% | -0.40% | -0.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.54% | -6.67% | -12.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 2.08% | +0.75% |
Volatility
FFGCX vs. BCSKX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) has a higher volatility of 6.15% compared to BlackRock Commodity Strategies Fund Class K (BCSKX) at 4.47%. This indicates that FFGCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCSKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFGCX | BCSKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.15% | 4.47% | +1.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.76% | 12.36% | +1.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.46% | 16.15% | +4.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.53% | 15.80% | +5.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.54% | 15.08% | +7.46% |