FFGAX vs. FSPGX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FFGAX (Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A) and FSPGX (Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund) are both mutual funds - FFGAX is a Commodities fund managed by Fidelity, while FSPGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FFGAX returned 12.66%/yr vs 13.59%/yr for FSPGX. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FFGAX charges 1.23%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for FSPGX.

Performance

FFGAX vs. FSPGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A (FFGAX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFGAX achieves a 15.83% return, which is significantly higher than FSPGX's 3.18% return.

FFGAX

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: -5.58%
• YTD: 15.83%
• 6M: 15.21%
• 1Y: 36.19%
• 3Y*: 17.25%
• 5Y*: 12.66%
• 10Y*: 12.24%

FSPGX

• 1D: -1.26%
• 1M: -2.49%
• YTD: 3.18%
• 6M: 1.86%
• 1Y: 19.95%
• 3Y*: 22.60%
• 5Y*: 13.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFGAX vs. FSPGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFGAX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A	15.83%	28.27%	2.63%	-5.35%	20.37%	25.70%	5.78%	17.54%	-13.44%	17.38%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	3.18%	18.54%	33.27%	42.77%	-29.17%	27.57%	38.46%	36.38%	-1.79%	27.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FFGAX and FSPGX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.12
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.37
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2017	0.45

Over the past year, the correlation between FFGAX and FSPGX has dropped to 0.12 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FFGAX vs. FSPGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFGAX

FFGAX Risk / Return Rank: 67
FFGAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
FFGAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
FFGAX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
FFGAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
FFGAX Martin Ratio Rank: 85

FSPGX

FSPGX Risk / Return Rank: 21
FSPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 25
FSPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
FSPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
FSPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
FSPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFGAX vs. FSPGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A (FFGAX) and Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFGAX	FSPGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.10	1.32	+0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.74	1.83	+0.91
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.23	+0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.07	1.32	+2.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.75	4.33	+10.42

FFGAX vs. FSPGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the FSPGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGAX and FSPGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFGAX vs. FSPGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGAX drawdown since its inception was -57.71%, which is greater than FSPGX's maximum drawdown of -32.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGAX and FSPGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFGAX	FSPGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.71%	-32.66%	-25.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.75%	-16.17%	+7.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.46%	-23.32%	+3.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.29%	-32.66%	+5.37%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-48.61%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.44%	-5.35%	-3.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-19.77%	-6.36%	-13.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	4.92%	-2.50%

Volatility

FFGAX vs. FSPGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A (FFGAX) is 5.38%, while Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund (FSPGX) has a volatility of 5.94%. This indicates that FFGAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSPGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFGAX	FSPGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.38%	5.94%	-0.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.87%	12.61%	+1.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.04%	16.21%	+0.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.40%	21.61%	-0.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.46%	21.56%	+0.90%

FFGAX vs. FSPGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGAX has a 1.23% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPGX's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFGAX vs. FSPGX - Dividend Comparison

FFGAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.93%, more than FSPGX's 0.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFGAX Fidelity Advisor Global Commodity Stock Fund Class A	1.93%	2.24%	2.32%	1.79%	1.68%	3.16%	1.30%	2.84%	1.93%	0.36%	1.29%	2.51%
FSPGX Fidelity Large Cap Growth Index Fund	0.33%	0.34%	0.37%	0.73%	0.86%	2.22%	1.76%	1.04%	1.32%	0.22%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFGAX and FSPGX in my portfolio?

FFGAX and FSPGX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFGAX or FSPGX?

FSPGX has higher volatility (5.94%) compared to FFGAX (5.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGAX dropped -57.71% vs FSPGX's -32.66%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FFGAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.