PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFFLX vs. JIEHX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFFLX vs. JIEHX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class A (FFFLX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio (JIEHX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FFFLX having a 11.61% return and JIEHX slightly higher at 12.08%.


FFFLX

1D
-0.60%
1M
3.07%
YTD
11.61%
6M
13.04%
1Y
26.64%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
9.22%
10Y*
11.73%

JIEHX

1D
-0.72%
1M
3.71%
YTD
12.08%
6M
12.67%
1Y
27.88%
3Y*
19.49%
5Y*
9.79%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFFLX vs. JIEHX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFFLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class A
11.61%22.73%13.41%18.92%-18.34%15.79%17.25%26.29%-8.46%20.56%
JIEHX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio
12.08%20.12%15.37%18.47%-18.03%18.48%16.08%25.00%-8.22%16.82%

Correlation

The correlation between FFFLX and JIEHX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2017

0.98

The correlation between FFFLX and JIEHX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFFLX vs. JIEHX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFFLX
FFFLX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
FFFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

JIEHX
JIEHX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
JIEHX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JIEHX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
JIEHX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
JIEHX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JIEHX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFFLX vs. JIEHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class A (FFFLX) and John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio (JIEHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFFLXJIEHXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.42

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

3.08

-0.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.16

13.65

-1.49

FFFLX vs. JIEHX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFFLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the JIEHX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFFLX and JIEHX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFFLXJIEHXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.33

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.65

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.70

-0.26

Drawdowns

FFFLX vs. JIEHX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFFLX drawdown since its inception was -58.29%, which is greater than JIEHX's maximum drawdown of -32.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFFLX and JIEHX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFFLXJIEHXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.29%

-32.55%

-25.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.79%

-9.18%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.15%

-16.15%

+1.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.47%

-25.70%

-1.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.60%

-0.72%

+0.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.12%

-4.99%

-4.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.24%

2.06%

+0.18%

Volatility

FFFLX vs. JIEHX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class A (FFFLX) has a higher volatility of 4.31% compared to John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio (JIEHX) at 3.60%. This indicates that FFFLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JIEHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFFLXJIEHXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.31%

3.60%

+0.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

9.63%

+0.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.68%

12.10%

+0.58%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.97%

15.24%

-0.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.48%

16.45%

-0.97%

FFFLX vs. JIEHX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFFLX has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than JIEHX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFFLX vs. JIEHX - Dividend Comparison

FFFLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.61%, more than JIEHX's 3.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFLX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom 2050 Fund Class A
6.61%5.87%1.42%1.25%10.58%9.34%5.18%6.72%11.39%4.24%4.52%3.69%
JIEHX
John Hancock Funds Multi-Index 2060 Lifetime Portfolio
3.16%3.55%1.76%2.17%6.57%5.15%3.18%6.88%6.99%1.76%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, FFFLX and JIEHX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFFLX has higher volatility (4.31%) compared to JIEHX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFFLX dropped -58.29% vs JIEHX's -32.55%.

JIEHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFFLX and JIEHX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer