FFFHX vs. FFSZX
FFFHX (Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund) and FFSZX (Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6) are both Target Retirement Date funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FFFHX returned 10.89%/yr vs 10.92%/yr for FFSZX. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FFFHX charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for FFSZX.
Performance
FFFHX vs. FFSZX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFFHX achieves a 14.64% return, which is significantly higher than FFSZX's 13.36% return.
FFFHX
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- 3.94%
- YTD
- 14.64%
- 6M
- 15.46%
- 1Y
- 31.65%
- 3Y*
- 19.95%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- 12.62%
FFSZX
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 4.02%
- YTD
- 13.36%
- 6M
- 15.00%
- 1Y
- 30.36%
- 3Y*
- 19.77%
- 5Y*
- 10.92%
- 10Y*
- —
FFFHX vs. FFSZX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFFHX Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund | 14.64% | 23.72% | 14.11% | 20.45% | -18.29% | 16.59% | 18.25% | 9.57% |
FFSZX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 | 13.36% | 24.08% | 14.41% | 20.78% | -18.05% | 16.81% | 18.36% | 9.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFFHX and FFSZX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.99 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2019 | 0.99 |
The correlation between FFFHX and FFSZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFFHX vs. FFSZX — Risk / Return Rank
FFFHX
FFSZX
FFFHX vs. FFSZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FFFHX | FFSZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.42 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 3.13 | +0.15 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.30 | 13.73 | +0.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FFFHX vs. FFSZX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFFHX drawdown since its inception was -56.38%, which is greater than FFSZX's maximum drawdown of -31.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFFHX and FFSZX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFFHX | FFSZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.38% | -31.00% | -25.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.70% | -9.77% | +0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.36% | -15.36% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.39% | -27.17% | -0.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.91% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.20% | +1.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.81% | -5.78% | -3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.22% | 2.22% | 0.00% |
Volatility
FFFHX vs. FFSZX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund (FFFHX) and Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 (FFSZX) have volatilities of 5.73% and 5.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFFHX | FFSZX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | 5.79% | -0.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.60% | 11.68% | -0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.63% | 13.68% | -0.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.16% | 15.18% | -0.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.44% | 17.11% | -1.67% |
FFFHX vs. FFSZX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFFHX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than FFSZX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFFHX vs. FFSZX - Dividend Comparison
FFFHX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.22%, more than FFSZX's 5.05% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFFHX Fidelity Freedom 2050 Fund | 5.22% | 4.14% | 1.86% | 1.78% | 11.83% | 11.76% | 4.93% | 6.48% | 7.69% | 3.98% | 4.12% | 4.16% |
FFSZX Fidelity Freedom 2065 Fund Class K6 | 5.05% | 3.82% | 2.92% | 2.26% | 8.99% | 7.98% | 2.41% | 1.47% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, FFFHX and FFSZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FFSZX has higher volatility (5.79%) compared to FFFHX (5.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFFHX dropped -56.38% vs FFSZX's -31.00%.
FFFHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFFHX and FFSZX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer