PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFFGX vs. FSMDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFFGX vs. FSMDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund (FFFGX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFFGX achieves a 11.70% return, which is significantly lower than FSMDX's 14.95% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FFFGX having a 11.90% annualized return and FSMDX not far behind at 11.45%.


FFFGX

1D
2.21%
1M
-1.21%
6M
7.71%
YTD
11.70%
1Y
24.12%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
9.88%
10Y*
11.90%
ALL TIME*
8.11%

FSMDX

1D
0.35%
1M
-0.33%
6M
11.53%
YTD
14.95%
1Y
20.72%
3Y*
14.95%
5Y*
8.30%
10Y*
11.45%
ALL TIME*
12.64%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FFFGX vs. FSMDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFFGX
Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund
11.70%23.77%13.95%20.56%-18.29%16.55%18.22%25.41%-8.89%22.22%
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
14.95%10.58%15.55%17.20%-17.27%22.56%17.13%30.53%-9.38%18.04%

Correlation

The correlation between FFFGX and FSMDX is 0.80, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2011

0.91

The correlation between FFFGX and FSMDX shifts across timeframes, from 0.80 (1 year) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFFGX vs. FSMDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FFFGX
FFFGX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
FFFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

FSMDX
FSMDX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FSMDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSMDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSMDX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
FSMDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSMDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FFFGX vs. FSMDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund (FFFGX) and Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFFGXFSMDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.24

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

2.25

+0.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.77

8.71

+1.07

FFFGX vs. FSMDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the FSMDX Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFFGX and FSMDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFFGX vs. FSMDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFFGX drawdown since its inception was -54.61%, which is greater than FSMDX's maximum drawdown of -40.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFFGX and FSMDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFFGXFSMDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.61%

-40.35%

-14.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.57%

-8.16%

-1.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.42%

-20.92%

+5.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.33%

-26.07%

-1.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.95%

-40.35%

+9.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.45%

-0.66%

-1.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.30%

-4.91%

-3.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.29%

2.11%

+0.18%

Volatility

FFFGX vs. FSMDX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund (FFFGX) has a higher volatility of 4.24% compared to Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund (FSMDX) at 2.42%. This indicates that FFFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFFGXFSMDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.24%

2.42%

+1.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.01%

10.22%

+1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.04%

13.71%

+0.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.20%

18.26%

-3.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.36%

19.27%

-3.91%

FFFGX vs. FSMDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFFGX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FSMDX's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFFGX vs. FSMDX - Dividend Comparison

FFFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, more than FSMDX's 0.76% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFGX
Fidelity Freedom 2045 Fund
5.88%4.40%1.97%1.84%12.04%12.00%4.99%6.51%7.82%4.01%4.15%4.07%
FSMDX
Fidelity Mid Cap Index Fund
0.76%1.10%2.46%1.39%2.07%3.35%2.34%2.86%2.21%2.17%2.23%2.84%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFFGX and FSMDX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFFGX has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to FSMDX (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFFGX dropped -54.61% vs FSMDX's -40.35%.

FFFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.60 vs 1.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFFGX and FSMDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer