FFEM vs. IEMG
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG).
FFEM and IEMG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FFEM is managed by Fidelity. IEMG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2012.
Performance
FFEM vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FFEM vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FFEM Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF | 6.04% | 40.03% | -2.27% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 3.76% | 32.56% | -1.48% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFEM achieves a 6.04% return, which is significantly higher than IEMG's 3.76% return.
FFEM
- 1D
- 4.43%
- 1M
- -8.84%
- YTD
- 6.04%
- 6M
- 12.60%
- 1Y
- 41.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IEMG
- 1D
- 3.61%
- 1M
- -9.13%
- YTD
- 3.76%
- 6M
- 7.65%
- 1Y
- 33.09%
- 3Y*
- 16.07%
- 5Y*
- 4.37%
- 10Y*
- 8.23%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FFEM vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFEM has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FFEM vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank
FFEM
IEMG
FFEM vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFEM | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.90 | 1.68 | +0.22 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.53 | 2.27 | +0.25 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.34 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.04 | 2.48 | +0.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.69 | 9.61 | +2.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFEM | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 1.68 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.52 | 0.28 | +1.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between FFEM and IEMG is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FFEM vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison
FFEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%, less than IEMG's 2.65% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFEM Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF | 1.54% | 1.59% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.65% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
Drawdowns
FFEM vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFEM drawdown since its inception was -16.29%, smaller than the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFEM and IEMG.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFEM | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.29% | -38.71% | +22.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.57% | -13.21% | -0.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.93% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.74% | -10.08% | +0.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.44% | -13.11% | +10.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 3.41% | +0.12% |
Volatility
FFEM vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Fundamental Emerging Markets ETF (FFEM) has a higher volatility of 11.96% compared to iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) at 10.48%. This indicates that FFEM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FFEM | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.96% | 10.48% | +1.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.75% | 14.67% | +2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.16% | 19.78% | +2.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 17.91% | +3.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.13% | 19.84% | +1.29% |